Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs AMD Radeon RX 550
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 and AMD Radeon RX 550 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, API support, Memory, Technologies, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 50 Watt
- Around 89% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1780 vs 940
- Around 89% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1780 vs 940
- Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2992 vs 2158
- Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2992 vs 2158
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 10 July 2019 vs 18 April 2017 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1780 vs 940 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1780 vs 940 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2992 vs 2158 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2992 vs 2158 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 550
- 3.7x more core clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 3% higher boost clock speed: 1183 MHz vs 1150 MHz
- 10.7x more pipelines: 512 vs 48
- Around 83% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11719 vs 6387
- Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 488 vs 389
- Around 57% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2713 vs 1727
- Around 61% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4485 vs 2792
- Around 61% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4485 vs 2792
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1183 MHz vs 1150 MHz |
Pipelines | 512 vs 48 |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11719 vs 6387 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 488 vs 389 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2713 vs 1727 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4485 vs 2792 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4485 vs 2792 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 550
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 | AMD Radeon RX 550 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6387 | 11719 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 389 | 488 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1727 | 2713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1780 | 940 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1780 | 940 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2992 | 2158 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2992 | 2158 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2792 | 4485 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2792 | 4485 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 33.507 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1037.305 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.064 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 52.533 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 140.911 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1200 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 | AMD Radeon RX 550 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Intel Gen. 9.5 (Coffee Lake) | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT3e | Lexa |
Launch date | 10 July 2019 | 18 April 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 814 | 850 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Design | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $79 | |
Price now | $75 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 59.51 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | 1183 MHz |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1100 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 512 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 50 Watt |
Floating-point performance | 1.2 TFLOPs | |
Texture fill rate | 37.86 GTexel / s | |
Transistor count | 2,200 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
DisplayPort support | ||
eDP 1.2 signal support | Yes | |
HDMI | ||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | |
Dual-link DVI support | ||
VGA | ||
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Memory type | DDR3/DDR4 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | Yes | |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 112 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
Quick Sync | ||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
Length | 145 mm | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 400 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | None |