Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs AMD Radeon RX 550

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 and AMD Radeon RX 550 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, API support, Memory, Technologies, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 2 month(s) later
  • 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 50 Watt
  • Around 89% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1780 vs 940
  • Around 89% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1780 vs 940
  • Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2992 vs 2158
  • Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2992 vs 2158
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 10 July 2019 vs 18 April 2017
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt vs 50 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1780 vs 940
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1780 vs 940
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2992 vs 2158
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2992 vs 2158

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 550

  • 3.7x more core clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 300 MHz
  • Around 3% higher boost clock speed: 1183 MHz vs 1150 MHz
  • 10.7x more pipelines: 512 vs 48
  • Around 83% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11719 vs 6387
  • Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 488 vs 389
  • Around 57% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2713 vs 1727
  • Around 61% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4485 vs 2792
  • Around 61% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4485 vs 2792
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1100 MHz vs 300 MHz
Boost clock speed 1183 MHz vs 1150 MHz
Pipelines 512 vs 48
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 11719 vs 6387
PassMark - G2D Mark 488 vs 389
PassMark - G3D Mark 2713 vs 1727
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 4485 vs 2792
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 4485 vs 2792

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 550

Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
6387
11719
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
389
488
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1727
2713
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1780
940
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1780
940
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2992
2158
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2992
2158
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2792
4485
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2792
4485
Name Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 AMD Radeon RX 550
Geekbench - OpenCL 6387 11719
PassMark - G2D Mark 389 488
PassMark - G3D Mark 1727 2713
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1780 940
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1780 940
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2992 2158
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2992 2158
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2792 4485
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2792 4485
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 33.507
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1037.305
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 3.064
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 52.533
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 140.911
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 1200

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 AMD Radeon RX 550

Essentials

Architecture Intel Gen. 9.5 (Coffee Lake) GCN 4.0
Code name Kaby Lake GT3e Lexa
Launch date 10 July 2019 18 April 2017
Place in performance rating 814 850
Type Laptop Desktop
Design Radeon RX 500 Series
GCN generation 4th Gen
Launch price (MSRP) $79
Price now $75
Value for money (0-100) 59.51

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1150 MHz 1183 MHz
Core clock speed 300 MHz 1100 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 14 nm
Pipelines 48 512
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt 50 Watt
Floating-point performance 1.2 TFLOPs
Texture fill rate 37.86 GTexel / s
Transistor count 2,200 million

Video outputs and ports

DisplayPort support
eDP 1.2 signal support Yes
HDMI
Display Connectors 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
Dual-link DVI support
VGA

API support

DirectX 12 12
OpenCL 2.0
OpenGL 4.5
Vulkan

Memory

Memory type DDR3/DDR4 GDDR5
Shared memory Yes
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB
Memory bandwidth 112 GB/s
Memory bus width 128 bit
Memory clock speed 7000 MHz

Technologies

H265/HEVC Decode
Quick Sync
4K H264 Decode
4K H264 Encode
AMD Eyefinity
AMD Radeon™ Chill
AMD Radeon™ ReLive
AppAcceleration
FreeSync
H265/HEVC Encode
HDMI 4K Support
LiquidVR
PowerTune
TrueAudio
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)
Video Code Engine (VCE)
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR)

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x8
Length 145 mm
Recommended system power (PSU) 400 Watt
Supplementary power connectors None