Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs Intel HD Graphics 4000
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 and Intel HD Graphics 4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, API support, Memory, Technologies, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 10% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 1050 MHz
- 3x more pipelines: 48 vs 16
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 22 nm
- 3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 45 Watt
- 11.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6372 vs 538
- Around 94% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 376 vs 194
- 5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1750 vs 347
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1780 vs 1492
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1780 vs 1492
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2992 vs 2392
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2992 vs 2392
- 3.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2792 vs 754
- 3.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2792 vs 754
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 10 July 2019 vs 14 May 2012 |
Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz vs 1050 MHz |
Pipelines | 48 vs 16 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 22 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 45 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6372 vs 538 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 376 vs 194 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1750 vs 347 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1780 vs 1492 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1780 vs 1492 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2992 vs 2392 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2992 vs 2392 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2792 vs 754 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2792 vs 754 |
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4000
- 2.2x more core clock speed: 650 MHz vs 300 MHz
Core clock speed | 650 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 4000
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 | Intel HD Graphics 4000 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6372 | 538 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 376 | 194 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1750 | 347 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1780 | 1492 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1780 | 1492 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2992 | 2392 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2992 | 2392 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2792 | 754 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2792 | 754 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.712 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 155.638 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.931 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 7.36 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 12.009 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 | Intel HD Graphics 4000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Intel Gen. 9.5 (Coffee Lake) | Generation 7.0 |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT3e | Ivy Bridge GT2 |
Launch date | 10 July 2019 | 14 May 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 834 | 1501 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | 1050 MHz |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 650 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 22 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 16 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 45 Watt |
Floating-point performance | 33.6 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 4.2 GTexel / s | |
Transistor count | 1,200 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
DisplayPort support | ||
eDP 1.2 signal support | Yes | |
HDMI | ||
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 11.1 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.0 | |
Memory |
||
Memory type | DDR3/DDR4 | |
Shared memory | Yes | 1 |
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | |
Technologies |
||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
Quick Sync | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 |