Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, API support, Memory, Technologies, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 17% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 980 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 11.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 170 Watt
Launch date | 10 July 2019 vs 10 May 2012 |
Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz vs 980 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 170 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670
- 3.3x more core clock speed: 980 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 28x more pipelines: 1344 vs 48
- 2.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 15511 vs 6372
- Around 43% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 537 vs 376
- 3.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5345 vs 1750
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3686 vs 1780
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3686 vs 1780
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3361 vs 2992
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3361 vs 2992
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7038 vs 2792
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7038 vs 2792
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 980 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 1344 vs 48 |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 15511 vs 6372 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 537 vs 376 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5345 vs 1750 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3686 vs 1780 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3686 vs 1780 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 vs 2992 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 vs 2992 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7038 vs 2792 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7038 vs 2792 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6372 | 15511 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 376 | 537 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1750 | 5345 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1780 | 3686 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1780 | 3686 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2992 | 3361 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2992 | 3361 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2792 | 7038 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2792 | 7038 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 41.613 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 971.208 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.281 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 40.404 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 86.208 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1839 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Intel Gen. 9.5 (Coffee Lake) | Kepler |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT3e | GK104 |
Launch date | 10 July 2019 | 10 May 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 834 | 554 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | |
Price now | $474.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 13.20 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | 980 MHz |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 980 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 1344 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 170 Watt |
CUDA cores | 1344 | |
Floating-point performance | 2,459.5 gflops | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
Texture fill rate | 102.5 billion / sec | |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
DisplayPort support | ||
eDP 1.2 signal support | Yes | |
HDMI | ||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Display Connectors | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI..., 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.2 | |
Memory |
||
Memory type | DDR3/DDR4 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | Yes | |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 192.2 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 256-bit GDDR5 | |
Memory clock speed | 6.0 GB/s | |
Technologies |
||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
Quick Sync | ||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Length | 9.5" (24.1 cm) | |
SLI options | 3-way | |
Supplementary power connectors | Two 6-pin |