Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, API support, Memory, Technologies, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 44% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 797 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 5x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 75 Watt
- Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 374 vs 341
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 10 July 2019 vs 30 May 2013 |
Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz vs 797 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 374 vs 341 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M
- 2.7x more core clock speed: 811 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 20x more pipelines: 960 vs 48
- Around 34% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8570 vs 6378
- Around 63% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2794 vs 1719
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3651 vs 1780
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3651 vs 1780
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3331 vs 2992
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3331 vs 2992
- Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4133 vs 2792
- Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4133 vs 2792
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 811 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 960 vs 48 |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8570 vs 6378 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2794 vs 1719 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3651 vs 1780 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3651 vs 1780 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3331 vs 2992 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3331 vs 2992 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4133 vs 2792 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4133 vs 2792 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6378 | 8570 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 374 | 341 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1719 | 2794 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1780 | 3651 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1780 | 3651 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2992 | 3331 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2992 | 3331 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2792 | 4133 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2792 | 4133 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 29.528 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 731.755 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.486 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 42.15 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 87.659 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 964 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Intel Gen. 9.5 (Coffee Lake) | Kepler |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT3e | GK106 |
Launch date | 10 July 2019 | 30 May 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 841 | 844 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $189.99 | |
Price now | $177.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 19.67 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | 797 MHz |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 811 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 960 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 75 Watt |
CUDA cores | 960 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,530 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 63.76 GTexel / s | |
Transistor count | 2,540 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
DisplayPort support | ||
eDP 1.2 signal support | Yes | Up to 3840x2160 |
HDMI | ||
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | ||
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12 API |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Memory |
||
Memory type | DDR3/DDR4 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | Yes | 0 |
Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 96.0 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | |
Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
Quick Sync | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
CUDA | ||
Direct Compute | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus | ||
TXAA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | |
Laptop size | large | |
SLI options | 1 | |
Supplementary power connectors | None |