Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, API support, Memory, Technologies, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645

Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 6 month(s) later
Around 21% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 950 MHz
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
3.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 50 Watt
Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 389 vs 340

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	10 July 2019 vs 9 January 2015
Boost clock speed	1150 MHz vs 950 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt vs 50 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	389 vs 340

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M

3.1x more core clock speed: 944 MHz vs 300 MHz
21.3x more pipelines: 1024 vs 48
2.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 14701 vs 6387
2.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3775 vs 1727
Around 44% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2566 vs 1780
Around 44% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2566 vs 1780
Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3337 vs 2992
Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3337 vs 2992
2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5783 vs 2792
2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5783 vs 2792

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	944 MHz vs 300 MHz
Pipelines	1024 vs 48
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	14701 vs 6387
PassMark - G3D Mark	3775 vs 1727
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2566 vs 1780
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2566 vs 1780
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3337 vs 2992
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3337 vs 2992
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	5783 vs 2792
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	5783 vs 2792

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

6387

14701

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

389

340

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1727

3775

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1780

2566

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1780

2566

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2992

3337

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2992

3337

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2792

5783

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2792

5783

Name	Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M
Geekbench - OpenCL	6387	14701
PassMark - G2D Mark	389	340
PassMark - G3D Mark	1727	3775
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1780	2566
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1780	2566
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2992	3337
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2992	3337
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2792	5783
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2792	5783
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		67.59
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		720.592
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		3.903
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		57.947
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		223.296
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		1831

Compare specifications (specs)

	Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M
Essentials
Architecture	Intel Gen. 9.5 (Coffee Lake)	Maxwell 2.0
Code name	Kaby Lake GT3e	GM204
Launch date	10 July 2019	9 January 2015
Place in performance rating	814	703
Type	Laptop	Laptop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1150 MHz	950 MHz
Core clock speed	300 MHz	944 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	48	1024
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt	50 Watt
CUDA cores		1024
Floating-point performance		2,355 gflops
Texture fill rate		73.6 GTexel / s
Transistor count		5,200 million
Video outputs and ports
DisplayPort support
eDP 1.2 signal support	Yes
HDMI
Display Connectors		No outputs
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support		1
G-SYNC support
VGA аnalog display support		1
API support
DirectX	12	12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL		1.1
OpenGL		4.5
Memory
Memory type	DDR3/DDR4	GDDR5
Shared memory	Yes	0
Maximum RAM amount		2 GB
Memory bandwidth		80 GB / s
Memory bus width		128 Bit
Memory clock speed		2500 MHz
Technologies
H265/HEVC Decode
Quick Sync
Ansel
BatteryBoost
CUDA
DSR
GameStream
GameWorks
GeForce Experience
GeForce ShadowPlay
GPU Boost
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
Optimus
SLI
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Bus support		PCI Express 3.0
Interface		MXM-B (3.0)
Laptop size		large
SLI options		1
Supplementary power connectors		None