Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs AMD FirePro W5130M
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 and AMD FirePro W5130M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 24% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 925 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 16x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1590 vs 1410
- Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 377 vs 301
- Around 34% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7012 vs 5224
- Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2652 vs 1879
- Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2652 vs 1879
- Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3340 vs 2582
- Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3340 vs 2582
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 3 January 2017 vs 2 October 2015 |
| Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz vs 925 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 2 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1590 vs 1410 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 377 vs 301 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 7012 vs 5224 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2652 vs 1879 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2652 vs 1879 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 vs 2582 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 vs 2582 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W5130M
- 3x more core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 10.7x more pipelines: 512 vs 48
- Around 7% better floating-point performance: 947.2 gflops vs 883 gflops
- Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2090 vs 1564
- Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2090 vs 1564
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 512 vs 48 |
| Floating-point performance | 947.2 gflops vs 883 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2090 vs 1564 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2090 vs 1564 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W5130M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 | AMD FirePro W5130M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1590 | 1410 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 377 | 301 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 7012 | 5224 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2652 | 1879 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2652 | 1879 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1564 | 2090 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1564 | 2090 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 | 2582 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 | 2582 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.588 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 505.57 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.885 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.114 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 89.784 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 | AMD FirePro W5130M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Kaby Lake GT3e | Tropo |
| Launch date | 3 January 2017 | 2 October 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 851 | 1116 |
| Type | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | 925 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 883 gflops | 947.2 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 48 | 512 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 1,500 million |
| Texture fill rate | 29.6 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 1 | 0 |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB / s | |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| Enduro | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 with others
IntelIris Plus Graphics 650 vs
NVIDIAGeForce Go 6800
IntelIris Plus Graphics 650 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 3470 Hybrid X2
IntelIris Plus Graphics 650 vs
AMDFirePro M6100
IntelIris Plus Graphics 650 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8650D IGP
IntelIris Plus Graphics 650 vs
AMDFirePro S9300 X2
IntelIris Plus Graphics 650 vs
AMDRadeon RX 550
