Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650

Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 1 month(s) later
Around 18% better floating-point performance: 883 gflops vs 748.8 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
10x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 150 Watt
32x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 1 GB
Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 377 vs 368
Around 6% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7012 vs 6607
Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3340 vs 3108
Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3340 vs 3108

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	3 January 2017 vs 15 November 2010
Floating-point performance	883 gflops vs 748.8 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt vs 150 Watt
Maximum memory size	32 GB vs 1 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	377 vs 368
Geekbench - OpenCL	7012 vs 6607
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3340 vs 3108
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3340 vs 3108

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE

4.3x more core clock speed: 1300 MHz vs 300 MHz
6x more pipelines: 288 vs 48
Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2011 vs 1590
Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3044 vs 2652
Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3044 vs 2652
2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3491 vs 1564
2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3491 vs 1564

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	1300 MHz vs 300 MHz
Pipelines	288 vs 48
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	2011 vs 1590
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	3044 vs 2652
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	3044 vs 2652
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3491 vs 1564
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3491 vs 1564

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1590

2011

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

377

368

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

7012

6607

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2652

3044

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2652

3044

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1564

3491

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1564

3491

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3340

3108

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3340

3108

Name	Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE
PassMark - G3D Mark	1590	2011
PassMark - G2D Mark	377	368
Geekbench - OpenCL	7012	6607
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2652	3044
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2652	3044
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1564	3491
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1564	3491
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3340	3108
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3340	3108
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		18.62
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		635.018
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		1.755
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		24.476
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		48.203

Compare specifications (specs)

	Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE
Essentials
Architecture	Generation 9.5	Fermi
Code name	Kaby Lake GT3e	GF104
Launch date	3 January 2017	15 November 2010
Place in performance rating	851	922
Type	Laptop	Desktop
Launch price (MSRP)		$160
Price now		$159.99
Value for money (0-100)		15.95
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1150 MHz
Core clock speed	300 MHz	1300 MHz
Floating-point performance	883 gflops	748.8 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	40 nm
Pipelines	48	288
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt	150 Watt
Transistor count	189 million	1,950 million
CUDA cores		288
Maximum GPU temperature		104 °C
Texture fill rate		31.2 billion / sec
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, 2 x Dual-Link DVI-I1 x Mini HDMI
Audio input for HDMI		Internal
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution		2048x1536
Multi monitor support
Number of display connectors		2
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x1	PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus support		16x PCI-E 2.0
Height		4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
Length		8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm)
SLI options		2-way
Supplementary power connectors		6-pin & 6-pin
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_1)	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.5	4.1
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	32 GB	1 GB
Memory bus width	64 / 128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory type	DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4	GDDR5
Shared memory	1
Memory bandwidth		108.8 GB / s
Memory clock speed		1700 MHz
Technologies
Quick Sync
3D Vision
CUDA
DSR
SLI
Surround