Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 7 month(s) later
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
  • 10x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 150 Watt
  • 32x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 1 GB
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 3 January 2017 vs 17 May 2011
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt vs 150 Watt
Maximum memory size 32 GB vs 1 GB
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3340 vs 3332
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3340 vs 3332

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560

  • 2.7x more core clock speed: 810 MHz vs 300 MHz
  • 7x more pipelines: 336 vs 48
  • Around 23% better floating-point performance: 1,088.6 gflops vs 883 gflops
  • Around 73% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2768 vs 1604
  • Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 431 vs 360
  • Around 22% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8692 vs 7146
  • Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3754 vs 2652
  • Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3754 vs 2652
  • 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3667 vs 1564
  • 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3667 vs 1564
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 810 MHz vs 300 MHz
Pipelines 336 vs 48
Floating-point performance 1,088.6 gflops vs 883 gflops
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 2768 vs 1604
PassMark - G2D Mark 431 vs 360
Geekbench - OpenCL 8692 vs 7146
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 3754 vs 2652
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 3754 vs 2652
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3667 vs 1564
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3667 vs 1564

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1604
2768
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
360
431
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
7146
8692
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2652
3754
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2652
3754
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1564
3667
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1564
3667
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3340
3332
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3340
3332
Name Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560
PassMark - G3D Mark 1604 2768
PassMark - G2D Mark 360 431
Geekbench - OpenCL 7146 8692
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2652 3754
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2652 3754
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1564 3667
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1564 3667
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3340 3332
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3340 3332
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 25.82
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 623.187
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 2.201
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 30.402
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 62.233
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 0

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560

Essentials

Architecture Generation 9.5 Fermi 2.0
Code name Kaby Lake GT3e GF114
Launch date 3 January 2017 17 May 2011
Place in performance rating 875 878
Type Laptop Desktop
Launch price (MSRP) $199
Price now $353.59
Value for money (0-100) 10.61

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1150 MHz
Core clock speed 300 MHz 810 MHz
Floating-point performance 883 gflops 1,088.6 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 48 336
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt 150 Watt
Transistor count 189 million 1,950 million
Maximum GPU temperature 99 °C
Texture fill rate 45.4 GTexel / s

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs Two Dual Link DVI, Mini HDMI, 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
Audio input for HDMI Internal
HDCP
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution 2048x1536
Multi monitor support

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x1 PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus support 16x PCI-E 2.0
Height 4.376" (11.1 cm)
Length 8.25" (21 cm)
SLI options 2-Way
Supplementary power connectors Two 6-pin

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_1) 12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.5 4.1

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 1 GB
Memory bus width 64 / 128 Bit 256 Bit
Memory type DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 GDDR5
Shared memory 1
Memory bandwidth 128.0 GB / s
Memory clock speed 4000 MHz

Technologies

Quick Sync
3D Blu-Ray
3D Gaming
3D Vision
CUDA
SLI