Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs NVIDIA Quadro K4000

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 and NVIDIA Quadro K4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 10 month(s) later
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • 5.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 80 Watt
  • 10.7x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 3 GB
  • Around 5% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7011 vs 6662
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3340 vs 3321
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3340 vs 3321
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 3 January 2017 vs 1 March 2013
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt vs 80 Watt
Maximum memory size 32 GB vs 3 GB
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 7011 vs 6662
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3340 vs 3321
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3340 vs 3321

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K4000

  • 2.7x more core clock speed: 810 MHz vs 300 MHz
  • 16x more pipelines: 768 vs 48
  • Around 41% better floating-point performance: 1,244 gflops vs 883 gflops
  • Around 71% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2723 vs 1590
  • Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 418 vs 377
  • Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3798 vs 2652
  • Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3798 vs 2652
  • 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3651 vs 1564
  • 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3651 vs 1564
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 810 MHz vs 300 MHz
Pipelines 768 vs 48
Floating-point performance 1,244 gflops vs 883 gflops
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 2723 vs 1590
PassMark - G2D Mark 418 vs 377
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 3798 vs 2652
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 3798 vs 2652
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3651 vs 1564
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3651 vs 1564

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K4000

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1590
2723
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
377
418
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
7011
6662
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2652
3798
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2652
3798
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1564
3651
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1564
3651
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3340
3321
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3340
3321
Name Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 NVIDIA Quadro K4000
PassMark - G3D Mark 1590 2723
PassMark - G2D Mark 377 418
Geekbench - OpenCL 7011 6662
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2652 3798
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2652 3798
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1564 3651
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1564 3651
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3340 3321
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3340 3321
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 18.437
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 427.88
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.897
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 23.742
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 61.965
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 817

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 NVIDIA Quadro K4000

Essentials

Architecture Generation 9.5 Kepler
Code name Kaby Lake GT3e GK106
Launch date 3 January 2017 1 March 2013
Place in performance rating 852 888
Type Laptop Workstation
Launch price (MSRP) $1,269
Price now $225.65
Value for money (0-100) 14.81

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1150 MHz
Core clock speed 300 MHz 810 MHz
Floating-point performance 883 gflops 1,244 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 48 768
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt 80 Watt
Transistor count 189 million 2,540 million
Texture fill rate 51.84 GTexel / s

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x1 PCIe 2.0 x16
Length 241 mm
Supplementary power connectors 1x 6-pin

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_1) 12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.5 4.6
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 3 GB
Memory bus width 64 / 128 Bit 192 Bit
Memory type DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 GDDR5
Shared memory 1
Memory bandwidth 134.8 GB / s
Memory clock speed 5616 MHz

Technologies

Quick Sync