Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs NVIDIA Quadro K4000
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 and NVIDIA Quadro K4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 5.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 80 Watt
- 10.7x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 3 GB
- Around 7% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7128 vs 6666
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3340 vs 3321
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3340 vs 3321
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 3 January 2017 vs 1 March 2013 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 80 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 3 GB |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7128 vs 6666 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 vs 3321 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 vs 3321 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K4000
- 2.7x more core clock speed: 810 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 16x more pipelines: 768 vs 48
- Around 41% better floating-point performance: 1,244 gflops vs 883 gflops
- Around 70% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2720 vs 1604
- Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 423 vs 360
- Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3798 vs 2652
- Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3798 vs 2652
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3651 vs 1564
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3651 vs 1564
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 810 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 768 vs 48 |
Floating-point performance | 1,244 gflops vs 883 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2720 vs 1604 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 423 vs 360 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3798 vs 2652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3798 vs 2652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3651 vs 1564 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3651 vs 1564 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K4000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 | NVIDIA Quadro K4000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1604 | 2720 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 360 | 423 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7128 | 6666 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2652 | 3798 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2652 | 3798 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1564 | 3651 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1564 | 3651 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 | 3321 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 | 3321 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.462 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 427.88 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.899 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 23.742 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 61.965 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 817 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 | NVIDIA Quadro K4000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Kepler |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT3e | GK106 |
Launch date | 3 January 2017 | 1 March 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 875 | 878 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1,269 | |
Price now | $225.65 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 14.81 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 810 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 883 gflops | 1,244 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 768 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 80 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 2,540 million |
Texture fill rate | 51.84 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 241 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 3 GB |
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 192 Bit |
Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Memory bandwidth | 134.8 GB / s | |
Memory clock speed | 5616 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |