Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 14x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 210 Watt
- 25.6x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 1280 MB
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 3 January 2017 vs 29 November 2011 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 210 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 1280 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 vs 3333 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 vs 3333 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
- 2.4x more core clock speed: 732 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 9.3x more pipelines: 448 vs 48
- Around 49% better floating-point performance: 1,311.7 gflops vs 883 gflops
- Around 73% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4590 vs 2652
- Around 73% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4590 vs 2652
- Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2133 vs 1564
- Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2133 vs 1564
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 732 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 448 vs 48 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,311.7 gflops vs 883 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4590 vs 2652 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4590 vs 2652 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2133 vs 1564 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2133 vs 1564 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1603 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 356 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 7114 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2652 | 4590 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2652 | 4590 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1564 | 2133 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1564 | 2133 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 | 3333 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 | 3333 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 34.324 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1181.463 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.978 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 58.37 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 121.575 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4197 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Fermi 2.0 |
| Code name | Kaby Lake GT3e | GF110 |
| Launch date | 3 January 2017 | 29 November 2011 |
| Place in performance rating | 876 | 879 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $289 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 732 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 883 gflops | 1,311.7 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 48 | 448 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 210 Watt |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 3,000 million |
| Texture fill rate | 41.0 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 1280 MB |
| Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 320 Bit |
| Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 1 | |
| Memory bandwidth | 152.0 GB / s | |
| Memory clock speed | 3800 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 with others
IntelIris Plus Graphics 650 vs
ATIMobility Radeon X300
IntelIris Plus Graphics 650 vs
NVIDIAGeForce Go 6200
IntelIris Plus Graphics 650 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
IntelIris Plus Graphics 650 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 950M
IntelIris Plus Graphics 650 vs
AMDRadeon R9 M375X
IntelIris Plus Graphics 650 vs
AMDRadeon 540
