Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 11 month(s) later
  • 3.2x better floating-point performance: 883 gflops vs 280 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 65 nm
  • 5.2x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 78 Watt
  • 64x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 512 MB
  • 4.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1590 vs 378
  • 4.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 377 vs 91
  • Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3340 vs 3285
  • Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3340 vs 3285
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 3 January 2017 vs 8 January 2008
Floating-point performance 883 gflops vs 280 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 65 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt vs 78 Watt
Maximum memory size 32 GB vs 512 MB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 1590 vs 378
PassMark - G2D Mark 377 vs 91
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3340 vs 3285
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3340 vs 3285

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700

  • Around 67% higher core clock speed: 500 MHz vs 300 MHz
  • 2.3x more pipelines: 112 vs 48
Core clock speed 500 MHz vs 300 MHz
Pipelines 112 vs 48

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1590
378
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
377
91
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3340
3285
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3340
3285
Name Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700
PassMark - G3D Mark 1590 378
PassMark - G2D Mark 377 91
Geekbench - OpenCL 7012
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2652
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2652
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1564
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1564
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3340 3285
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3340 3285

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700

Essentials

Architecture Generation 9.5 Tesla
Code name Kaby Lake GT3e G92
Launch date 3 January 2017 8 January 2008
Place in performance rating 851 1299
Type Laptop Workstation
Launch price (MSRP) $1,599
Price now $99.02
Value for money (0-100) 8.26

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1150 MHz
Core clock speed 300 MHz 500 MHz
Floating-point performance 883 gflops 280 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 65 nm
Pipelines 48 112
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt 78 Watt
Transistor count 189 million 754 million
Texture fill rate 28 GTexel / s

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 2x DVI, 1x S-Video

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x1 PCIe 2.0 x16
Length 267 mm
Supplementary power connectors 1x 6-pin

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_1) 10.0
OpenGL 4.5 3.3

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 512 MB
Memory bus width 64 / 128 Bit 256 Bit
Memory type DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 GDDR3
Shared memory 1
Memory bandwidth 51.2 GB / s
Memory clock speed 1600 MHz

Technologies

Quick Sync