Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- 3.2x better floating-point performance: 883 gflops vs 280 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 65 nm
- 5.2x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 78 Watt
- 64x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 512 MB
- 4.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1590 vs 378
- 4.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 377 vs 91
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3340 vs 3285
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3340 vs 3285
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 3 January 2017 vs 8 January 2008 |
Floating-point performance | 883 gflops vs 280 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 65 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 78 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 512 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1590 vs 378 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 377 vs 91 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 vs 3285 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 vs 3285 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700
- Around 67% higher core clock speed: 500 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 2.3x more pipelines: 112 vs 48
Core clock speed | 500 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 112 vs 48 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1590 | 378 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 377 | 91 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7012 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2652 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2652 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1564 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1564 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 | 3285 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 | 3285 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Tesla |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT3e | G92 |
Launch date | 3 January 2017 | 8 January 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 851 | 1299 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1,599 | |
Price now | $99.02 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 8.26 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 500 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 883 gflops | 280 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 112 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 78 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 754 million |
Texture fill rate | 28 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB / s | |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |