Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650

Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 4 month(s) later
2.5x better floating-point performance: 883 gflops vs 352.0 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 65 nm
5x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 75 Watt
32x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 1 GB
3.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1590 vs 456
4.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 377 vs 88
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3340 vs 3315
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3340 vs 3315

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	3 January 2017 vs 14 August 2008
Floating-point performance	883 gflops vs 352.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 65 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt vs 75 Watt
Maximum memory size	32 GB vs 1 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	1590 vs 456
PassMark - G2D Mark	377 vs 88
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3340 vs 3315
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3340 vs 3315

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M

Around 83% higher core clock speed: 550 MHz vs 300 MHz
2.7x more pipelines: 128 vs 48

Core clock speed	550 MHz vs 300 MHz
Pipelines	128 vs 48

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1590

456

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

377

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3340

3315

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3340

3315

Name	Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650	NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M
PassMark - G3D Mark	1590	456
PassMark - G2D Mark	377	88
Geekbench - OpenCL	7012
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2652
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2652
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1564
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1564
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3340	3315
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3340	3315

Compare specifications (specs)

	Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650	NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M
Essentials
Architecture	Generation 9.5	Tesla
Code name	Kaby Lake GT3e	G92
Launch date	3 January 2017	14 August 2008
Place in performance rating	851	1298
Type	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Launch price (MSRP)		$925
Price now		$925
Value for money (0-100)		1.12
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1150 MHz
Core clock speed	300 MHz	550 MHz
Floating-point performance	883 gflops	352.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	65 nm
Pipelines	48	128
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt	75 Watt
Transistor count	189 million	754 million
Texture fill rate		35.2 GTexel / s
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x1	MXM-HE
Laptop size		large
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_1)	10.0
OpenGL	4.5	3.3
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	32 GB	1 GB
Memory bus width	64 / 128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory type	DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4	GDDR3
Shared memory	1	0
Memory bandwidth		51.2 GB / s
Memory clock speed		1600 MHz
Technologies
Quick Sync
CUDA
PowerMizer 8.0