Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs ATI Mobility Radeon 9550
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 and ATI Mobility Radeon 9550 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
- Videocard is newer: launch date 13 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 20% higher core clock speed: 300 MHz vs 250 MHz
- 5.7x more boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 210 MHz
- 12x more pipelines: 48 vs 4
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 130 nm
- 57.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1726 vs 30
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 359 vs 166
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 September 2017 vs 1 June 2004 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz vs 250 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 210 MHz |
Pipelines | 48 vs 4 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 130 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1726 vs 30 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 359 vs 166 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon 9550
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 | ATI Mobility Radeon 9550 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1726 | 30 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 359 | 166 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7343 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 37.109 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 465.116 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.796 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 29.115 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 54.932 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2780 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1884 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2780 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1884 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 619 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 | ATI Mobility Radeon 9550 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Rage 9 |
Code name | Coffee Lake GT3e | M12 |
Launch date | 1 September 2017 | 1 June 2004 |
Place in performance rating | 1043 | 1040 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | 210 MHz |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 250 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 130 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 4 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Transistor count | 189 million | 76 million |
Texture fill rate | 1 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | AGP 4x |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 9.0 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 2.0 |
Memory |
||
Memory type | DDR3 / DDR4 | 64 |
Maximum RAM amount | 64 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 3.89 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 183 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 486 MHz | |
Shared memory | no |