Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs Intel UHD Graphics 630

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 and Intel UHD Graphics 630 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655

• 2x more pipelines: 48 vs 24
• Around 39% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1721 vs 1237
• Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 357 vs 299
• Around 58% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7356 vs 4657
• Around 35% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 37.109 vs 27.517
• Around 31% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 465.116 vs 354.254
• Around 55% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.796 vs 1.807
• Around 43% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 29.115 vs 20.323
• Around 87% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 54.932 vs 29.327
• Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2780 vs 1870
• Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1884 vs 1596
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3343 vs 3309
• Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2780 vs 1870
• Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1884 vs 1596
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3343 vs 3309
• 9.1x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 619 vs 68

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 630

• Around 17% higher core clock speed: 350 MHz vs 300 MHz

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
GPU 2: Intel UHD Graphics 630

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1721 1237
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	357 299
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	7356 4657
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	37.109 27.517
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	465.116 354.254
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.796 1.807
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	29.115 20.323
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	54.932 29.327
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2780 1870
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1884 1596
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3343 3309
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2780 1870
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1884 1596
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3343 3309
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	619 68

Compare specifications (specs)