Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 versus Intel UHD Graphics 630
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 and Intel UHD Graphics 630 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
- 2x plus de pipelines: 48 versus 24
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1721 versus 1237
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 357 versus 299
- Environ 58% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 7356 versus 4657
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 37.109 versus 27.517
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 465.116 versus 354.254
- Environ 55% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.796 versus 1.807
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 29.115 versus 20.323
- Environ 87% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 54.932 versus 29.327
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2780 versus 1870
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1884 versus 1596
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3343 versus 3309
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2780 versus 1870
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1884 versus 1596
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3343 versus 3309
- 9.1x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 619 versus 68
| Caractéristiques | |
| Pipelines | 48 versus 24 |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1721 versus 1237 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 357 versus 299 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 7356 versus 4657 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 37.109 versus 27.517 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 465.116 versus 354.254 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.796 versus 1.807 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 29.115 versus 20.323 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 54.932 versus 29.327 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2780 versus 1870 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1884 versus 1596 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 versus 3309 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2780 versus 1870 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1884 versus 1596 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 versus 3309 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 619 versus 68 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics 630
- Environ 17% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 350 MHz versus 300 MHz
| Vitesse du noyau | 350 MHz versus 300 MHz |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
GPU 2: Intel UHD Graphics 630
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 | Intel UHD Graphics 630 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1721 | 1237 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 357 | 299 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 7356 | 4657 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 37.109 | 27.517 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 465.116 | 354.254 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.796 | 1.807 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 29.115 | 20.323 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 54.932 | 29.327 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2780 | 1870 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1884 | 1596 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 | 3309 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2780 | 1870 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1884 | 1596 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 | 3309 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 619 | 68 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Generation 9.5 |
| Nom de code | Coffee Lake GT3e | Coffee Lake GT2 |
| Date de sortie | 1 September 2017 | 1 September 2017 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1031 | 1234 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1200 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 350 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Pipelines | 48 | 24 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 189 million | 189 million |
| Performance á point flottant | 460.8 gflops | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 28.8 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3 / DDR4 | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | |
| Mémoire partagé | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 avec des autres
IntelIris Plus Graphics 655 vs
NVIDIAGeForce4 Ti 4600
IntelIris Plus Graphics 655 vs
NVIDIAGeForce4 4200 Go
IntelIris Plus Graphics 655 vs
ATIRadeon 9500
IntelIris Plus Graphics 655 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7470M
IntelIris Plus Graphics 655 vs
NVIDIAGRID K160Q
IntelIris Plus Graphics 655 vs
IntelHD Graphics P630
