Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, API support, Memory, Technologies, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 16% higher boost clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 950 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 28 nm
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 50 Watt
- Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3714 vs 2566
- Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3714 vs 2566
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 28 May 2019 vs 9 January 2015 |
| Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 950 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 50 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 vs 2566 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 vs 2566 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 vs 3337 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 vs 3337 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M
- 3.1x more core clock speed: 944 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 16x more pipelines: 1024 vs 64
- Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5783 vs 3751
- Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5783 vs 3751
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 944 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 1024 vs 64 |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5783 vs 3751 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5783 vs 3751 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3751 | 5783 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3751 | 5783 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 2566 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 2566 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3337 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3337 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3812 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 344 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 14492 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 67.59 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 720.592 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.903 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 57.947 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 223.296 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1831 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Intel Gen. 11 (Ice Lake) | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | Ice Lake G7 Gen. 11 | GM204 |
| Launch date | 28 May 2019 | 9 January 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 682 | 684 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | 950 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 944 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 2.25 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1.12 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 64 | 1024 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 50 Watt |
| CUDA cores | 1024 | |
| Floating-point performance | 2,355 gflops | |
| Texture fill rate | 73.6 GTexel / s | |
| Transistor count | 5,200 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| DisplayPort support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | 1 | |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| VGA аnalog display support | 1 | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Memory |
||
| Memory type | DDR4 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | Yes | 0 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 80 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
| Ansel | ||
| BatteryBoost | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DSR | ||
| GameStream | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| SLI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| SLI options | 1 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) with others
IntelIris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) vs
ATIFireGL V5100
IntelIris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) vs
ATIRadeon X600 PRO
IntelIris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) vs
AMDFirePro W5170M
IntelIris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 965M
IntelIris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) vs
AMDRadeon Pro 455
IntelIris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) vs
IntelArc Pro A40
