Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200

Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 6 month(s) later
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 40 nm
8.1x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 244 Watt

Launch date	27 May 2013 vs 9 November 2010
Manufacturing process technology	22 nm vs 40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	30 Watt vs 244 Watt

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580

7.7x more core clock speed: 1544 MHz vs 200 MHz
4.8x more texture fill rate: 49.4 billion / sec vs 10.4 GTexel / s
12.8x more pipelines: 512 vs 40
15.2x better floating-point performance: 1,581.1 gflops vs 104.0 gflops
3.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4612 vs 1181
Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 482 vs 391
2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5953 vs 2095
2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5953 vs 2095
3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 15124 vs 5067
Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 3285
Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 3285

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	1544 MHz vs 200 MHz
Texture fill rate	49.4 billion / sec vs 10.4 GTexel / s
Pipelines	512 vs 40
Floating-point performance	1,581.1 gflops vs 104.0 gflops
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	4612 vs 1181
PassMark - G2D Mark	482 vs 391
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	5953 vs 2095
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	5953 vs 2095
Geekbench - OpenCL	15124 vs 5067
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3717 vs 3285
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3717 vs 3285

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1181

4612

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

391

482

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2095

5953

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2095

5953

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

5067

15124

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3285

3717

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3285

3717

Name	Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580
PassMark - G3D Mark	1181	4612
PassMark - G2D Mark	391	482
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2095	5953
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2095	5953
Geekbench - OpenCL	5067	15124
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3285	3717
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3285	3717
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		40.048
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		872.651
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		4.338
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		32.378
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		132.363
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)		3357
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)		3357
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		809

Compare specifications (specs)

	Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580
Essentials
Architecture	Generation 7.5	Fermi 2.0
Code name	Haswell GT3e	GF110
Launch date	27 May 2013	9 November 2010
Place in performance rating	649	651
Type	Laptop	Desktop
Launch price (MSRP)		$499
Price now		$289.88
Value for money (0-100)		19.21
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1300 MHz
Core clock speed	200 MHz	1544 MHz
Floating-point performance	104.0 gflops	1,581.1 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	22 nm	40 nm
Pipelines	40	512
Texture fill rate	10.4 GTexel / s	49.4 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	30 Watt	244 Watt
Transistor count	392 million	3,000 million
CUDA cores		512
Maximum GPU temperature		97 °C
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	Mini HDMITwo Dual Link DVI, 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
Audio input for HDMI		Internal
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution		2048x1536
Multi monitor support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 1.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Laptop size	medium sized
Bus support		PCI-E 2.0 x 16
Height		4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
Length		10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm)
SLI options		3-way
Supplementary power connectors		One 6-pin and One 8-pin
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_1)	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.3	4.2
Memory
Memory type	eDRAM	GDDR5
Shared memory	1
Maximum RAM amount		1536 MB
Memory bandwidth		192.4 GB / s
Memory bus width		384 Bit
Memory clock speed		2004 MHz (4008 data rate)
Technologies
Quick Sync
3D Vision
CUDA
DSR
SLI
Surround