Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 versus Intel HD Graphics P4600
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 and Intel HD Graphics P4600 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 3 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 22 nm
- 5.6x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 84 Watt
- 3.9x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1995 versus 506
- 2.6x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 8932 versus 3372
- 5.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 49.145 versus 8.915
- 3.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 450.087 versus 146.479
- 2.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.059 versus 1.178
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 25.346 versus 10.689
- 10.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 67.077 versus 6.64
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 1 September 2015 versus 1 June 2013 |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 22 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 84 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1995 versus 506 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8932 versus 3372 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 49.145 versus 8.915 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 450.087 versus 146.479 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.059 versus 1.178 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 25.346 versus 10.689 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 67.077 versus 6.64 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 versus 3345 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 versus 3345 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics P4600
- Environ 17% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 350 MHz versus 300 MHz
- Environ 25% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1250 MHz versus 1000 MHz
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 491 versus 361
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3342 versus 1668
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3342 versus 1668
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 350 MHz versus 300 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1250 MHz versus 1000 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 491 versus 361 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3342 versus 1668 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3342 versus 1668 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics P4600
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 | Intel HD Graphics P4600 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1995 | 506 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 361 | 491 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8932 | 3372 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 49.145 | 8.915 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 450.087 | 146.479 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.059 | 1.178 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 25.346 | 10.689 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 67.077 | 6.64 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2846 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1668 | 3342 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3345 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2846 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1668 | 3342 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3345 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 | Intel HD Graphics P4600 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.0 | Generation 7.5 |
Nom de code | Skylake GT4e | Haswell GT2 |
Date de sortie | 1 September 2015 | 1 June 2013 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1008 | 1009 |
Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1000 MHz | 1250 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 350 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 22 nm |
Pipelines | 72 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 84 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 189 million | 392 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | IGP |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 64 GB | |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 | |
Mémoire partagé | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |