Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 vs NVIDIA GeForce 920A
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 and NVIDIA GeForce 920A videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 33 Watt
- 32x more maximum memory size: 64 GB vs 2 GB
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1978 vs 846
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 361 vs 168
- 2.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8750 vs 3693
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 September 2015 vs 13 March 2015 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 33 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 64 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1978 vs 846 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 361 vs 168 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8750 vs 3693 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 920A
- Around 92% higher core clock speed: 575 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 5.3x more pipelines: 384 vs 72
Core clock speed | 575 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 384 vs 72 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 920A
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 | NVIDIA GeForce 920A |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1978 | 846 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 361 | 168 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8750 | 3693 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 49.11 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 450.087 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.059 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 25.346 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 67.077 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2846 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1668 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2846 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1668 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 | NVIDIA GeForce 920A | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.0 | Kepler 2.0 |
Code name | Skylake GT4e | GK208B |
Launch date | 1 September 2015 | 13 March 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 993 | 1143 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 575 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 72 | 384 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 33 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | |
Floating-point performance | 441.6 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 9.2 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 64 GB | 2 GB |
Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |