Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 vs NVIDIA Tesla K20c

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 and NVIDIA Tesla K20c videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580

NVIDIA Tesla K20c

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580

Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 9 month(s) later
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
15x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 225 Watt
12.8x more maximum memory size: 64 GB vs 5 GB
Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 49.145 vs 39.423

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	1 September 2015 vs 12 November 2012
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt vs 225 Watt
Maximum memory size	64 GB vs 5 GB
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	49.145 vs 39.423

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K20c

2.4x more core clock speed: 706 MHz vs 300 MHz
34.7x more pipelines: 2496 vs 72
Around 75% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 15597 vs 8925
3.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1427.15 vs 450.087
Around 35% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.128 vs 3.059
2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 64.383 vs 25.346
2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 179.044 vs 67.077

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	706 MHz vs 300 MHz
Pipelines	2496 vs 72
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	15597 vs 8925
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1427.15 vs 450.087
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	4.128 vs 3.059
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	64.383 vs 25.346
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	179.044 vs 67.077

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla K20c

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

8925

15597

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

49.145

39.423

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

450.087

1427.15

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3.059

4.128

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

25.346

64.383

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

67.077

179.044

Name	Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580	NVIDIA Tesla K20c
PassMark - G3D Mark	1988
PassMark - G2D Mark	362
Geekbench - OpenCL	8925	15597
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	49.145	39.423
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	450.087	1427.15
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	3.059	4.128
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	25.346	64.383
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	67.077	179.044
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2846
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1668
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3355
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2846
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1668
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3355

Compare specifications (specs)

	Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580	NVIDIA Tesla K20c
Essentials
Architecture	Generation 9.0	Kepler
Code name	Skylake GT4e	GK110
Launch date	1 September 2015	12 November 2012
Place in performance rating	1015	1016
Type	Laptop	Workstation
Launch price (MSRP)		$3,199
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1000 MHz
Core clock speed	300 MHz	706 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	72	2496
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt	225 Watt
Transistor count	189 million	7,080 million
Floating-point performance		3,524 gflops
Texture fill rate		146.8 GTexel / s
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x1	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length		267 mm
Supplementary power connectors		1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_1)	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	64 GB	5 GB
Memory type	DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4	GDDR5
Shared memory	1
Memory bandwidth		208.0 GB / s
Memory bus width		320 Bit
Memory clock speed		5200 MHz
Technologies
Quick Sync