Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2600

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2600 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580

• Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 3 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 65 nm
• 256x more maximum memory size: 64 GB vs 256 MB
• 11.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1988 vs 168
• Around 36% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 362 vs 267
• Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3355 vs 1690
• Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3355 vs 1690

Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2600

• Around 67% higher core clock speed: 500 MHz vs 300 MHz
• Around 67% higher pipelines: 120 vs 72

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2600

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1988 168
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	362 267
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3355 1690
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3355 1690

Compare specifications (specs)