Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200

Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200

Around 15% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 1000 MHz

Boost clock speed	1150 MHz vs 1000 MHz

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300

2.7x more core clock speed: 800 MHz vs 300 MHz
Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1626 vs 1461
Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 572 vs 569
Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2536 vs 2475
Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2536 vs 2475
Around 32% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5885 vs 4466
Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1586 vs 958
Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1586 vs 958
Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2418 vs 2304
Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2418 vs 2304

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	800 MHz vs 300 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	1626 vs 1461
PassMark - G2D Mark	572 vs 569
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2536 vs 2475
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2536 vs 2475
Geekbench - OpenCL	5885 vs 4466
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1586 vs 958
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1586 vs 958
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2418 vs 2304
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2418 vs 2304

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
GPU 2: Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1461

1626

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

569

572

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2475

2536

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2475

2536

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

4466

5885

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

958

1586

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

958

1586

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2304

2418

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2304

2418

Name	Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200	Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300
PassMark - G3D Mark	1461	1626
PassMark - G2D Mark	569	572
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2475	2536
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2475	2536
Geekbench - OpenCL	4466	5885
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	958	1586
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	958	1586
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2304	2418
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2304	2418

Compare specifications (specs)

	Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200	Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300
Essentials
Architecture	Generation 8.0	Generation 8.0
Code name	Broadwell GT3e	Broadwell GT3e
Launch date	5 September 2014	5 September 2014
Place in performance rating	789	724
Type	Laptop	Desktop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1150 MHz	1000 MHz
Core clock speed	300 MHz	800 MHz
Floating-point performance	883.2 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	14 nm
Pipelines	48
Texture fill rate	55.2 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt	15 Watt
Transistor count	189 million	189 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x1	IGP
Laptop size	medium sized
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_1)	12.0 (11_1)
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Memory
Shared memory	1
Technologies
Quick Sync