Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 OEM
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 30% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 888 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 8.7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 130 Watt
| Launch date | 5 September 2014 vs 22 August 2012 |
| Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz vs 888 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 130 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 OEM
- 2.7x more core clock speed: 823 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 54% higher texture fill rate: 85.25 GTexel / s vs 55.2 GTexel / s
- 24x more pipelines: 1152 vs 48
- 2.3x better floating-point performance: 2,046 gflops vs 883.2 gflops
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5983 vs 2475
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5983 vs 2475
- 3.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3665 vs 958
- 3.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3665 vs 958
- Around 44% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3325 vs 2304
- Around 44% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3325 vs 2304
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 823 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 85.25 GTexel / s vs 55.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1152 vs 48 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,046 gflops vs 883.2 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5983 vs 2475 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5983 vs 2475 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3665 vs 958 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3665 vs 958 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3325 vs 2304 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3325 vs 2304 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 OEM
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1530 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 562 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2475 | 5983 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2475 | 5983 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4536 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 958 | 3665 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 958 | 3665 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2304 | 3325 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2304 | 3325 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 32.718 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1021.371 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.143 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 56.509 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 67.697 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 8.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | Broadwell GT3e | GK104 |
| Launch date | 5 September 2014 | 22 August 2012 |
| Place in performance rating | 808 | 811 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | 888 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 823 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 883.2 gflops | 2,046 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 48 | 1152 |
| Texture fill rate | 55.2 GTexel / s | 85.25 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 130 Watt |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 3,540 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Length | 241 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Shared memory | 1 | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 134.4 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 5600 MHz | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 with others
IntelIris Pro Graphics 6200 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 660 OEM
IntelIris Pro Graphics 6200 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
IntelIris Pro Graphics 6200 vs
AMDFirePro M4100
IntelIris Pro Graphics 6200 vs
AMDRadeon R7 350X OEM
IntelIris Pro Graphics 6200 vs
NVIDIAQuadro M1000M
IntelIris Pro Graphics 6200 vs
AMDFirePro S9300 X2
