Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200

Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
Around 11% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 1033 MHz
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
8.9x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 134 Watt
Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 569 vs 454

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	5 September 2014 vs 26 March 2013
Boost clock speed	1150 MHz vs 1033 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt vs 134 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	569 vs 454

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

3.3x more core clock speed: 980 MHz vs 300 MHz
Around 14% higher texture fill rate: 62.7 billion / sec vs 55.2 GTexel / s
16x more pipelines: 768 vs 48
Around 79% better floating-point performance: 1,585 gflops vs 883.2 gflops
2.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3350 vs 1461
Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3426 vs 2475
Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3426 vs 2475
2.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9507 vs 4466
3.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3642 vs 958
3.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3642 vs 958
Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3242 vs 2304
Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3242 vs 2304

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	980 MHz vs 300 MHz
Texture fill rate	62.7 billion / sec vs 55.2 GTexel / s
Pipelines	768 vs 48
Floating-point performance	1,585 gflops vs 883.2 gflops
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	3350 vs 1461
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	3426 vs 2475
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	3426 vs 2475
Geekbench - OpenCL	9507 vs 4466
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3642 vs 958
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3642 vs 958
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3242 vs 2304
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3242 vs 2304

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1461

3350

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

569

454

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2475

3426

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2475

3426

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

4466

9507

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

958

3642

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

958

3642

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2304

3242

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2304

3242

Name	Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
PassMark - G3D Mark	1461	3350
PassMark - G2D Mark	569	454
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2475	3426
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2475	3426
Geekbench - OpenCL	4466	9507
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	958	3642
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	958	3642
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2304	3242
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2304	3242
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		25.21
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		561.43
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		2.026
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		30.868
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		51.009
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		1106

Compare specifications (specs)

	Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
Essentials
Architecture	Generation 8.0	Kepler
Code name	Broadwell GT3e	GK106
Launch date	5 September 2014	26 March 2013
Place in performance rating	790	831
Type	Laptop	Desktop
Launch price (MSRP)		$169
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1150 MHz	1033 MHz
Core clock speed	300 MHz	980 MHz
Floating-point performance	883.2 gflops	1,585 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	48	768
Texture fill rate	55.2 GTexel / s	62.7 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt	134 Watt
Transistor count	189 million	2,540 million
CUDA cores		768
Maximum GPU temperature		97 °C
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI...
Audio input for HDMI		Internal
G-SYNC support
HDCP
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution		2048x1536
Multi monitor support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x1	PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size	medium sized
Bus support		PCI Express 3.0
Height		4.376" (11.1 cm)
Length		9.5" (24.1 cm)
Supplementary power connectors		One 6-pin
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_1)	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.6	4.3
Memory
Shared memory	1
Maximum RAM amount		2 GB
Memory bandwidth		144.2 GB / s
Memory bus width		192 Bit
Memory clock speed		6.0 GB/s
Memory type		GDDR5
Technologies
Quick Sync
3D Blu-Ray
3D Gaming
3D Vision
3D Vision Live
Adaptive VSync
CUDA
FXAA
GPU Boost
SLI
TXAA