Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 8 month(s) later
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
  • 14.6x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 219 Watt
  • Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 572 vs 471
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 5 September 2014 vs 7 December 2010
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt vs 219 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 572 vs 471

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570

  • Around 83% higher core clock speed: 1464 MHz vs 800 MHz
  • Around 92% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4862 vs 2536
  • Around 92% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4862 vs 2536
  • 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3668 vs 1586
  • 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3668 vs 1586
  • Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3325 vs 2418
  • Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3325 vs 2418
  • 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3929 vs 1600
  • 2.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 13266 vs 5848
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1464 MHz vs 800 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 4862 vs 2536
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 4862 vs 2536
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3668 vs 1586
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3668 vs 1586
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3325 vs 2418
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3325 vs 2418
PassMark - G3D Mark 3929 vs 1600
Geekbench - OpenCL 13266 vs 5848

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2536
4862
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2536
4862
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1586
3668
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1586
3668
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2418
3325
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2418
3325
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
572
471
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1600
3929
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
5848
13266
Name Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2536 4862
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2536 4862
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1586 3668
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1586 3668
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2418 3325
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2418 3325
PassMark - G2D Mark 572 471
PassMark - G3D Mark 1600 3929
Geekbench - OpenCL 5848 13266
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 36.849
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 736.185
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 4.369
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 40.08
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 122.953
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 0

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570

Essentials

Architecture Generation 8.0 Fermi 2.0
Code name Broadwell GT3e GF110
Launch date 5 September 2014 7 December 2010
Place in performance rating 732 734
Type Desktop Desktop
Launch price (MSRP) $349
Price now $99.99
Value for money (0-100) 48.11

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1000 MHz
Core clock speed 800 MHz 1464 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt 219 Watt
Transistor count 189 million 3,000 million
CUDA cores 480
Floating-point performance 1,405.4 gflops
Maximum GPU temperature 97 °C
Pipelines 480
Texture fill rate 43.9 billion / sec

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, Mini HDMITwo Dual Link DVI
Audio input for HDMI Internal
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution 2048x1536
Multi monitor support

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface IGP PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus support PCI-E 2.0 x 16
Height 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
Length 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm)
SLI options 3-way
Supplementary power connectors Two 6-pin

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_1) 12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.6 4.2

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 1280 MB
Memory bandwidth 152.0 GB / s
Memory bus width 320 Bit
Memory clock speed 1900 MHz (3800 data rate)
Memory type GDDR5

Technologies

3D Vision
CUDA
DSR
SLI
Surround