Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 14.6x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 219 Watt
- Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 572 vs 471
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 September 2014 vs 7 December 2010 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 219 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 572 vs 471 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570
- Around 83% higher core clock speed: 1464 MHz vs 800 MHz
- Around 92% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4862 vs 2536
- Around 92% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4862 vs 2536
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3668 vs 1586
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3668 vs 1586
- Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3325 vs 2418
- Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3325 vs 2418
- 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3929 vs 1600
- 2.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 13266 vs 5848
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1464 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4862 vs 2536 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4862 vs 2536 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3668 vs 1586 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3668 vs 1586 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3325 vs 2418 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3325 vs 2418 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3929 vs 1600 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 13266 vs 5848 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2536 | 4862 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2536 | 4862 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1586 | 3668 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1586 | 3668 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2418 | 3325 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2418 | 3325 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 572 | 471 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1600 | 3929 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5848 | 13266 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 36.849 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 736.185 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.369 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 40.08 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 122.953 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 8.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | Broadwell GT3e | GF110 |
Launch date | 5 September 2014 | 7 December 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 732 | 734 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $349 | |
Price now | $99.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 48.11 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 800 MHz | 1464 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 219 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 3,000 million |
CUDA cores | 480 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,405.4 gflops | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
Pipelines | 480 | |
Texture fill rate | 43.9 billion / sec | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, Mini HDMITwo Dual Link DVI |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 x 16 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
SLI options | 3-way | |
Supplementary power connectors | Two 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.2 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1280 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 152.0 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 320 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1900 MHz (3800 data rate) | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DSR | ||
SLI | ||
Surround |