Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 vs AMD Radeon R9 A375

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 and AMD Radeon R9 A375 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4

AMD Radeon R9 A375

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4

Around 19% higher boost clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 925 MHz
Around 43% higher texture fill rate: 52.80 GTexel/s vs 37.00 GTexel/s
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 28 nm
2.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2682 vs 1024
Around 58% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 367 vs 232

Specifications (specs)
Boost clock speed	1100 MHz vs 925 MHz
Texture fill rate	52.80 GTexel/s vs 37.00 GTexel/s
Manufacturing process technology	10 nm vs 28 nm
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	2682 vs 1024
PassMark - G2D Mark	367 vs 232

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 A375

Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 2 month(s) later
3x more core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 300 MHz
Around 67% higher pipelines: 640 vs 384

Launch date	2015 vs 2 Sep 2020
Core clock speed	900 MHz vs 300 MHz
Pipelines	640 vs 384

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 A375

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

2682

1024

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

367

232

Name	Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4	AMD Radeon R9 A375
PassMark - G3D Mark	2682	1024
PassMark - G2D Mark	367	232
Geekbench - OpenCL	12007
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	79.73
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1137.292
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	4.585
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	61.701
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	193.595
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	5609
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3708
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3356
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	5609
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3708
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3356

Compare specifications (specs)

	Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4	AMD Radeon R9 A375
Essentials
Architecture	Generation 12.0	GCN 1.0
Code name	Tiger Lake GT1	Venus
Launch date	2 Sep 2020	2015
Place in performance rating	631	632
Type	Laptop	Laptop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1100 MHz	925 MHz
Compute units	48	10
Core clock speed	300 MHz	900 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	10 nm	28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	211.2 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	1.690 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	844.8 GFLOPS	1184 GFLOPS
Pipelines	384	640
Pixel fill rate	13.20 GPixel/s	14.80 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	52.80 GTexel/s	37.00 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt
Transistor count		1500 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x1	PCIe 3.0 x16
Width	IGP
API support
DirectX	12.1	12
OpenCL	2.1	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.4	5.1
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount		2 GB
Memory bandwidth		72 GB/s
Memory bus width		128 bit
Memory clock speed		1125 MHz (4500 MHz effective)
Memory type		GDDR5