Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 vs ATI FirePro V9800

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 and ATI FirePro V9800 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 11 month(s) later
  • 776.5x more texture fill rate: 52.80 GTexel/s vs 68.0 GTexel / s
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 40 nm
  • 16.7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 250 Watt
  • 8.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 79.73 vs 9.718
  • Around 54% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1137.292 vs 738.1
  • 5.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.585 vs 0.867
  • 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 61.701 vs 27.153
  • Around 63% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 193.595 vs 118.756
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 2 Sep 2020 vs 9 September 2010
Texture fill rate 52.80 GTexel/s vs 68.0 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology 10 nm vs 40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt vs 250 Watt
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 79.73 vs 9.718
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1137.292 vs 738.1
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 4.585 vs 0.867
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 61.701 vs 27.153
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 193.595 vs 118.756

Reasons to consider the ATI FirePro V9800

  • 2.8x more core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 300 MHz
  • 4.2x more pipelines: 1600 vs 384
  • Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2727 vs 2683
  • Around 78% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 655 vs 368
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 850 MHz vs 300 MHz
Pipelines 1600 vs 384
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 2727 vs 2683
PassMark - G2D Mark 655 vs 368

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
GPU 2: ATI FirePro V9800

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
2683
2727
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
368
655
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
79.73
9.718
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1137.292
738.1
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
4.585
0.867
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
61.701
27.153
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
193.595
118.756
Name Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 ATI FirePro V9800
PassMark - G3D Mark 2683 2727
PassMark - G2D Mark 368 655
Geekbench - OpenCL 12008
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 79.73 9.718
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1137.292 738.1
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 4.585 0.867
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 61.701 27.153
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 193.595 118.756
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 5609
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3708
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3356
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 5609
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3708
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3356

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 ATI FirePro V9800

Essentials

Architecture Generation 12.0 TeraScale 2
Code name Tiger Lake GT1 Cypress
Launch date 2 Sep 2020 9 September 2010
Place in performance rating 632 629
Type Laptop Workstation
Launch price (MSRP) $3,499

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1100 MHz
Compute units 48
Core clock speed 300 MHz 850 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 10 nm 40 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 211.2 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 1.690 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 844.8 GFLOPS
Pipelines 384 1600
Pixel fill rate 13.20 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 52.80 GTexel/s 68.0 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt 250 Watt
Floating-point performance 2,720.0 gflops
Transistor count 2,154 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x S-Video

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x1 PCIe 2.0 x16
Width IGP
Length 267 mm
Supplementary power connectors 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

API support

DirectX 12.1 11.2 (11_0)
OpenCL 2.1
OpenGL 4.6 4.4
Shader Model 6.4
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB
Memory bandwidth 147.2 GB / s
Memory bus width 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 4600 MHz
Memory type GDDR5