Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 vs ATI FirePro V9800
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 and ATI FirePro V9800 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- 776.5x more texture fill rate: 52.80 GTexel/s vs 68.0 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 40 nm
- 16.7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 8.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 79.73 vs 9.718
- Around 54% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1137.292 vs 738.1
- 5.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.585 vs 0.867
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 61.701 vs 27.153
- Around 63% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 193.595 vs 118.756
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2 Sep 2020 vs 9 September 2010 |
Texture fill rate | 52.80 GTexel/s vs 68.0 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 79.73 vs 9.718 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1137.292 vs 738.1 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.585 vs 0.867 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 61.701 vs 27.153 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 193.595 vs 118.756 |
Reasons to consider the ATI FirePro V9800
- 2.8x more core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 4.2x more pipelines: 1600 vs 384
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2727 vs 2683
- Around 78% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 655 vs 368
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 1600 vs 384 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2727 vs 2683 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 655 vs 368 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
GPU 2: ATI FirePro V9800
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 | ATI FirePro V9800 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2683 | 2727 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 368 | 655 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12008 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 79.73 | 9.718 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1137.292 | 738.1 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.585 | 0.867 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 61.701 | 27.153 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 193.595 | 118.756 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5609 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5609 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 | ATI FirePro V9800 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.0 | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | Tiger Lake GT1 | Cypress |
Launch date | 2 Sep 2020 | 9 September 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 632 | 629 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $3,499 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | |
Compute units | 48 | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 850 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 40 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 211.2 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1.690 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 844.8 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 384 | 1600 |
Pixel fill rate | 13.20 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 52.80 GTexel/s | 68.0 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 250 Watt |
Floating-point performance | 2,720.0 gflops | |
Transistor count | 2,154 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Width | IGP | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 147.2 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 |