Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 vs Intel HD Graphics 5000
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 and Intel HD Graphics 5000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 50% higher core clock speed: 300 MHz vs 200 MHz
- 9.6x more pipelines: 384 vs 40
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 22 nm
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 30 Watt
- 4.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2666 vs 587
- Around 73% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 383 vs 221
- 3.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11991 vs 3134
- 8.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 79.859 vs 9.563
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1137.615 vs 490.588
- 7.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5609 vs 713
- 3.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3708 vs 1103
- Around 96% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 1713
- 7.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5609 vs 713
- 3.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3708 vs 1103
- Around 96% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 1713
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2 Sep 2020 vs 27 May 2013 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz vs 200 MHz |
Pipelines | 384 vs 40 |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm vs 22 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 30 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2666 vs 587 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 383 vs 221 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11991 vs 3134 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 79.859 vs 9.563 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1137.615 vs 490.588 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5609 vs 713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 vs 1103 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 1713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5609 vs 713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 vs 1103 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 1713 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 5000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 | Intel HD Graphics 5000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2666 | 587 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 383 | 221 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11991 | 3134 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 79.859 | 9.563 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1137.615 | 490.588 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.569 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 61.688 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 192.566 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5609 | 713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 | 1103 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 1713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5609 | 713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 | 1103 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 1713 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 | Intel HD Graphics 5000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.0 | Generation 7.5 |
Code name | Tiger Lake GT1 | Haswell GT3 |
Launch date | 2 Sep 2020 | 27 May 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 594 | 1388 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | 1100 MHz |
Compute units | 48 | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 200 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 22 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 211.2 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1.690 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 844.8 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 384 | 40 |
Pixel fill rate | 13.20 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 52.80 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 30 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,300 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Width | IGP | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |