Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 versus Intel HD Graphics 5000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 and Intel HD Graphics 5000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 7 ans 3 mois plus tard
- Environ 50% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 300 MHz versus 200 MHz
- 9.6x plus de pipelines: 384 versus 40
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 10 nm versus 22 nm
- 2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 30 Watt
- 4.5x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2666 versus 587
- Environ 73% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 383 versus 221
- 3.8x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 11991 versus 3134
- 8.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 79.859 versus 9.563
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1137.615 versus 490.588
- 7.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5609 versus 713
- 3.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3708 versus 1103
- Environ 96% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 versus 1713
- 7.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5609 versus 713
- 3.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3708 versus 1103
- Environ 96% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 versus 1713
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 2 Sep 2020 versus 27 May 2013 |
Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz versus 200 MHz |
Pipelines | 384 versus 40 |
Processus de fabrication | 10 nm versus 22 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 30 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2666 versus 587 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 383 versus 221 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11991 versus 3134 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 79.859 versus 9.563 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1137.615 versus 490.588 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5609 versus 713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 versus 1103 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 versus 1713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5609 versus 713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 versus 1103 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 versus 1713 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 5000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 | Intel HD Graphics 5000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2666 | 587 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 383 | 221 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11991 | 3134 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 79.859 | 9.563 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1137.615 | 490.588 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.569 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 61.688 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 192.566 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5609 | 713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 | 1103 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 1713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5609 | 713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 | 1103 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 1713 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 | Intel HD Graphics 5000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.0 | Generation 7.5 |
Nom de code | Tiger Lake GT1 | Haswell GT3 |
Date de sortie | 2 Sep 2020 | 27 May 2013 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 594 | 1388 |
Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1100 MHz | 1100 MHz |
Unités de Compute | 48 | |
Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 200 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 10 nm | 22 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 211.2 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1.690 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 844.8 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 384 | 40 |
Pixel fill rate | 13.20 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 52.80 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 30 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 1,300 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Largeur | IGP | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | |
Mémoire partagé | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |