Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- 907.2x more texture fill rate: 52.80 GTexel/s vs 58.2 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 14 nm
- 5x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 75 Watt
- Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 79.859 vs 67.209
- Around 42% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1137.615 vs 799.414
- Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.569 vs 4.536
- 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 61.688 vs 30.523
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3708 vs 3685
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3708 vs 3685
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2 Sep 2020 vs 25 October 2016 |
Texture fill rate | 52.80 GTexel/s vs 58.2 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm vs 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 79.859 vs 67.209 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1137.615 vs 799.414 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.569 vs 4.536 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 61.688 vs 30.523 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 vs 3685 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 vs 3685 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)
- 4.3x more core clock speed: 1290 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 27% higher boost clock speed: 1392 MHz vs 1100 MHz
- Around 67% higher pipelines: 640 vs 384
- Around 89% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5029 vs 2666
- Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 457 vs 383
- Around 46% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 17466 vs 11991
- Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 223.683 vs 192.566
- Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7043 vs 5609
- Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7043 vs 5609
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1290 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1392 MHz vs 1100 MHz |
Pipelines | 640 vs 384 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5029 vs 2666 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 457 vs 383 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 17466 vs 11991 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 223.683 vs 192.566 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7043 vs 5609 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7043 vs 5609 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 3356 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2666 | 5029 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 383 | 457 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11991 | 17466 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 79.859 | 67.209 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1137.615 | 799.414 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.569 | 4.536 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 61.688 | 30.523 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 192.566 | 223.683 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5609 | 7043 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 | 3685 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3360 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5609 | 7043 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 | 3685 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3360 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 122 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.0 | Pascal |
Code name | Tiger Lake GT1 | GP107 |
Launch date | 2 Sep 2020 | 25 October 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 594 | 586 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $109 | |
Price now | $124.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 56.95 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | 1392 MHz |
Compute units | 48 | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1290 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 211.2 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1.690 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 844.8 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 384 | 640 |
Pixel fill rate | 13.20 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 52.80 GTexel/s | 58.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 75 Watt |
CUDA cores | 640 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,862 gflops | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
Transistor count | 3,300 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, DP 1.4, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Width | IGP | 2-slot |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Height | 4.38" (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 300 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 112 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
GameStream | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
ShadowWorks | ||
VR Ready |