Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 10 mois plus tard
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 52.80 GTexel/s versus 58.2 GTexel / s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 10 nm versus 14 nm
- 5x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 75 Watt
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 79.859 versus 67.209
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1137.615 versus 799.414
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.569 versus 4.536
- 2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 61.688 versus 30.523
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3708 versus 3685
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3708 versus 3685
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 2 Sep 2020 versus 25 October 2016 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 52.80 GTexel/s versus 58.2 GTexel / s |
| Processus de fabrication | 10 nm versus 14 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 75 Watt |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 79.859 versus 67.209 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1137.615 versus 799.414 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.569 versus 4.536 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 61.688 versus 30.523 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 versus 3685 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 versus 3685 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)
- 4.3x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1290 MHz versus 300 MHz
- Environ 27% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1392 MHz versus 1100 MHz
- Environ 67% de pipelines plus haut: 640 versus 384
- Environ 89% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 5029 versus 2666
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 457 versus 383
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 17466 versus 11991
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 223.683 versus 192.566
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7043 versus 5609
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7043 versus 5609
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1290 MHz versus 300 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1392 MHz versus 1100 MHz |
| Pipelines | 640 versus 384 |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5029 versus 2666 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 457 versus 383 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 17466 versus 11991 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 223.683 versus 192.566 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7043 versus 5609 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 versus 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7043 versus 5609 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 versus 3356 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2666 | 5029 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 383 | 457 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11991 | 17466 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 79.859 | 67.209 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1137.615 | 799.414 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.569 | 4.536 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 61.688 | 30.523 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 192.566 | 223.683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5609 | 7043 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 | 3685 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3360 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5609 | 7043 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 | 3685 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3360 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 122 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Generation 12.0 | Pascal |
| Nom de code | Tiger Lake GT1 | GP107 |
| Date de sortie | 2 Sep 2020 | 25 October 2016 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 594 | 586 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $109 | |
| Prix maintenant | $124.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 56.95 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1100 MHz | 1392 MHz |
| Unités de Compute | 48 | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 1290 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 10 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 211.2 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1.690 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 844.8 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 384 | 640 |
| Pixel fill rate | 13.20 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 52.80 GTexel/s | 58.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Noyaux CUDA | 640 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,862 gflops | |
| Température maximale du GPU | 97 °C | |
| Compte de transistor | 3,300 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, DP 1.4, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDCP | ||
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Largeur | IGP | 2-slot |
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Hauteur | 4.38" (11.1 cm) | |
| Longeur | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 300 Watt | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 112 GB / s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 7008 MHz | |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Ansel | ||
| CUDA | ||
| GameStream | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
| ShadowWorks | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 avec des autres
IntelIris Xe Graphics G4 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 555 OEM
IntelIris Xe Graphics G4 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7550M
IntelIris Xe Graphics G4 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7970M
IntelIris Xe Graphics G4 vs
NVIDIANVS 810
IntelIris Xe Graphics G4 vs
AMDRadeon Pro WX 4100
IntelIris Xe Graphics G4 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook)
