Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 12 nm
Launch date | 2 Sep 2020 vs 23 April 2019 |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm vs 12 nm |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
- 4.7x more core clock speed: 1395 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 42% higher boost clock speed: 1560 MHz vs 1100 MHz
- 2.3x more pipelines: 896 vs 384
- 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6969 vs 2686
- Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 384 vs 371
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1395 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1560 MHz vs 1100 MHz |
Pipelines | 896 vs 384 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6969 vs 2686 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 384 vs 371 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2686 | 6969 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 371 | 384 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12010 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 79.73 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1136.391 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.584 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 61.715 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 193.592 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5609 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5609 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3435 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.0 | Turing |
Code name | Tiger Lake GT1 | TU117 |
Launch date | 2 Sep 2020 | 23 April 2019 |
Place in performance rating | 626 | 308 |
Type | Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | 1560 MHz |
Compute units | 48 | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1395 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 211.2 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1.690 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 844.8 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 384 | 896 |
Pixel fill rate | 13.20 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 52.80 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | |
Width | IGP | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 |