Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 vs AMD Radeon HD 8690M
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 and AMD Radeon HD 8690M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 42% higher boost clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 775 MHz
- 3200x more texture fill rate: 52.80 GTexel/s vs 16.5 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2686 vs 984
- 2.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 12010 vs 5079
- 3.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5609 vs 1579
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3708 vs 1813
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 3178
- 3.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5609 vs 1579
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3708 vs 1813
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 3178
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2 Sep 2020 vs 1 March 2013 |
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 775 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 52.80 GTexel/s vs 16.5 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm vs 28 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2686 vs 984 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12010 vs 5079 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5609 vs 1579 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 vs 1813 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 3178 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5609 vs 1579 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 vs 1813 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 3178 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8690M
- 2.6x more core clock speed: 775 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 768 vs 371
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 775 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 768 vs 371 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8690M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 | AMD Radeon HD 8690M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2686 | 984 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 371 | 768 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12010 | 5079 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 79.73 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1136.391 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.584 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 61.715 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 193.592 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5609 | 1579 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 | 1813 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3178 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5609 | 1579 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 | 1813 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3178 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 | AMD Radeon HD 8690M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Tiger Lake GT1 | Sun |
Launch date | 2 Sep 2020 | 1 March 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 626 | 625 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon HD 8000M Series | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | 775 MHz |
Compute units | 48 | 6 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 775 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 211.2 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1.690 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 844.8 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
Pixel fill rate | 13.20 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 52.80 GTexel/s | 16.5 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Floating-point performance | 528.0 gflops | |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Width | IGP | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 11 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 32 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Shared memory | 0 |