Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 vs AMD Radeon R9 M270X

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 and AMD Radeon R9 M270X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4

• Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 5 month(s) later
• Around 42% higher boost clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 775 MHz
• 1100x more texture fill rate: 52.80 GTexel/s vs 48 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 28 nm
• 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2686 vs 1204
• Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 371 vs 306

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M270X

• 2.4x more core clock speed: 725 MHz vs 300 MHz
• 2x more pipelines: 768 vs 384

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M270X

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2686 1204
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	371 306
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3708 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 3361
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3708 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 3361

Compare specifications (specs)