Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX and AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 57% higher boost clock speed: 1650 MHz vs 1053 MHz
- 1343.1x more texture fill rate: 79.20 GTexel/s vs 58.97 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 14 nm
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 50 Watt
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6889 vs 3301
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6889 vs 3301
- Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3462 vs 2086
- Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3462 vs 2086
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 31 Oct 2020 vs 1 March 2017 |
Boost clock speed | 1650 MHz vs 1053 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 79.20 GTexel/s vs 58.97 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm vs 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6889 vs 3301 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6889 vs 3301 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3462 vs 2086 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3462 vs 2086 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile
- 3.3x more core clock speed: 1002 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 17% higher pipelines: 896 vs 768
- 2.8x more memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 2133 MHz (4.3 Gbps effective)
- 3.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 51217 vs 14238
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6466 vs 3214
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6466 vs 3214
- Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 406 vs 311
- Around 38% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2728 vs 1972
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1002 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 896 vs 768 |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz vs 2133 MHz (4.3 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 51217 vs 14238 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6466 vs 3214 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6466 vs 3214 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 406 vs 311 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2728 vs 1972 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX | AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 14238 | 51217 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6889 | 3301 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6889 | 3301 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3462 | 2086 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3462 | 2086 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3214 | 6466 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3214 | 6466 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 311 | 406 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1972 | 2728 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.158 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 876.241 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.983 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 64.599 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 194.258 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX | AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.1 | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | DG1 | Baffin |
Launch date | 31 Oct 2020 | 1 March 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 523 | 639 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1650 MHz | 1053 MHz |
Compute units | 96 | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1002 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 633.6 GFLOPS (1:4) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 5.069 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 2.534 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 768 | 896 |
Pixel fill rate | 39.60 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 79.20 GTexel/s | 58.97 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 50 Watt |
Floating-point performance | 1,887 gflops | |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Width | IGP | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 68.26 GB/s | 112.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2133 MHz (4.3 Gbps effective) | 6000 MHz |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | GDDR5 |