Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX and AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 8 month(s) later
  • Around 57% higher boost clock speed: 1650 MHz vs 1053 MHz
  • 1343.1x more texture fill rate: 79.20 GTexel/s vs 58.97 GTexel / s
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 14 nm
  • 2x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 50 Watt
  • 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6889 vs 3301
  • 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6889 vs 3301
  • Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3462 vs 2086
  • Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3462 vs 2086
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 31 Oct 2020 vs 1 March 2017
Boost clock speed 1650 MHz vs 1053 MHz
Texture fill rate 79.20 GTexel/s vs 58.97 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology 10 nm vs 14 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 25 Watt vs 50 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 6889 vs 3301
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 6889 vs 3301
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3462 vs 2086
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3462 vs 2086

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile

  • 3.3x more core clock speed: 1002 MHz vs 300 MHz
  • Around 17% higher pipelines: 896 vs 768
  • 2.8x more memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 2133 MHz (4.3 Gbps effective)
  • 3.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 51217 vs 14238
  • 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6466 vs 3214
  • 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6466 vs 3214
  • Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 406 vs 311
  • Around 38% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2728 vs 1972
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1002 MHz vs 300 MHz
Pipelines 896 vs 768
Memory clock speed 6000 MHz vs 2133 MHz (4.3 Gbps effective)
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 51217 vs 14238
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 6466 vs 3214
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 6466 vs 3214
PassMark - G2D Mark 406 vs 311
PassMark - G3D Mark 2728 vs 1972

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile

Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
14238
51217
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
6889
3301
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
6889
3301
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3462
2086
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3462
2086
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3214
6466
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3214
6466
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
311
406
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1972
2728
Name Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile
Geekbench - OpenCL 14238 51217
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 6889 3301
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 6889 3301
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3462 2086
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3462 2086
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3214 6466
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3214 6466
PassMark - G2D Mark 311 406
PassMark - G3D Mark 1972 2728
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 46.158
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 876.241
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 3.983
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 64.599
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 194.258

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile

Essentials

Architecture Generation 12.1 GCN 4.0
Code name DG1 Baffin
Launch date 31 Oct 2020 1 March 2017
Place in performance rating 523 639
Type Laptop Workstation

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1650 MHz 1053 MHz
Compute units 96
Core clock speed 300 MHz 1002 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 10 nm 14 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 633.6 GFLOPS (1:4)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 5.069 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 2.534 TFLOPS
Pipelines 768 896
Pixel fill rate 39.60 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 79.20 GTexel/s 58.97 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 25 Watt 50 Watt
Floating-point performance 1,887 gflops
Transistor count 3,000 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 4.0 x4 PCIe 3.0 x8
Width IGP

API support

DirectX 12.1 12.0 (12_0)
OpenCL 2.1
OpenGL 4.6 4.5
Shader Model 6.4
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 4 GB
Memory bandwidth 68.26 GB/s 112.0 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 2133 MHz (4.3 Gbps effective) 6000 MHz
Memory type LPDDR4X GDDR5