Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX vs AMD Radeon RX 560
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX and AMD Radeon RX 560 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 38% higher boost clock speed: 1650 MHz vs 1200-1275 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 14 nm
- 3.2x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 60-80 Watt
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6889 vs 6571
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6889 vs 6571
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 31 Oct 2020 vs 18 April 2017 |
| Boost clock speed | 1650 MHz vs 1200-1275 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm vs 14 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 60-80 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6889 vs 6571 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6889 vs 6571 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 560
- 3.6x more core clock speed: 1090-1175 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 3% higher texture fill rate: 81.60 GTexel/s vs 79.20 GTexel/s
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 1024 vs 768
- 3.3x more memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 2133 MHz (4.3 Gbps effective)
- 4.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 57671 vs 13654
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3688 vs 3462
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3688 vs 3462
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3352 vs 3214
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3352 vs 3214
- Around 57% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 489 vs 311
- Around 85% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3645 vs 1972
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1090-1175 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 81.60 GTexel/s vs 79.20 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 1024 vs 768 |
| Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz vs 2133 MHz (4.3 Gbps effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 57671 vs 13654 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3688 vs 3462 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3688 vs 3462 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 vs 3214 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 vs 3214 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 489 vs 311 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3645 vs 1972 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 560
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX | AMD Radeon RX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 13654 | 57671 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6889 | 6571 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6889 | 6571 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3462 | 3688 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3462 | 3688 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3214 | 3352 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3214 | 3352 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 311 | 489 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1972 | 3645 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 56.81 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 775.281 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.602 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 64.428 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 257.062 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1774 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX | AMD Radeon RX 560 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 12.1 | GCN 4.0 |
| Code name | DG1 | Polaris 21 |
| Launch date | 31 Oct 2020 | 18 April 2017 |
| Place in performance rating | 527 | 529 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop, Laptop |
| Design | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
| GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $99 | |
| Price now | $104.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 54.35 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1650 MHz | 1200-1275 MHz |
| Compute units | 96 | 14/16 |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1090-1175 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 633.6 GFLOPS (1:4) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 5.069 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 2.534 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 768 | 1024 |
| Pixel fill rate | 39.60 GPixel/s | 20.40 GP/s |
| Texture fill rate | 79.20 GTexel/s | 81.60 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 60-80 Watt |
| Floating-point performance | 2.6 TFLOPs | |
| Render output units | 16 | |
| Stream Processors | 896/1024 | |
| Texture Units | 64 | |
| Transistor count | 3,000 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Width | IGP | |
| Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
| Length | 170 mm | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 68.26 GB/s | 112 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2133 MHz (4.3 Gbps effective) | 7000 MHz |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
| AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX with others
IntelIris Xe Graphics MAX vs
NVIDIAGeForce PCX 5750
IntelIris Xe Graphics MAX vs
NVIDIAGeForce 8100 + nForce 720a
IntelIris Xe Graphics MAX vs
AMDFirePro M6000
IntelIris Xe Graphics MAX vs
NVIDIAQuadro P1000
IntelIris Xe Graphics MAX vs
AMDRadeon RX 560
IntelIris Xe Graphics MAX vs
AMDRadeon Pro W6800X Duo
