Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX vs AMD FirePro M6000
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX and AMD FirePro M6000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- 2475x more texture fill rate: 79.20 GTexel/s vs 32 GTexel / s
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 768 vs 640
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 72% lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 43 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 75% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 14127 vs 8095
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6889 vs 3024
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6889 vs 3024
- Around 89% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3462 vs 1832
- Around 89% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3462 vs 1832
- Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1972 vs 1820
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 31 Oct 2020 vs 1 July 2012 |
| Texture fill rate | 79.20 GTexel/s vs 32 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 768 vs 640 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 43 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 14127 vs 8095 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6889 vs 3024 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6889 vs 3024 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3462 vs 1832 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3462 vs 1832 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1972 vs 1820 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro M6000
- 2.7x more core clock speed: 800 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 88% higher memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 2133 MHz (4.3 Gbps effective)
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 3214
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 3214
- 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 776 vs 311
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 800 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 2133 MHz (4.3 Gbps effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3214 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3214 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 776 vs 311 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX
GPU 2: AMD FirePro M6000
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX | AMD FirePro M6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 14127 | 8095 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6889 | 3024 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6889 | 3024 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3462 | 1832 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3462 | 1832 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3214 | 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3214 | 3357 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 311 | 776 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1972 | 1820 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX | AMD FirePro M6000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 12.1 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | DG1 | Heathrow |
| Launch date | 31 Oct 2020 | 1 July 2012 |
| Place in performance rating | 520 | 525 |
| Type | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1650 MHz | |
| Compute units | 96 | |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 633.6 GFLOPS (1:4) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 5.069 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 2.534 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 768 | 640 |
| Pixel fill rate | 39.60 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 79.20 GTexel/s | 32 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 43 Watt |
| Floating-point performance | 1,024 gflops | |
| Transistor count | 1,500 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| StereoOutput3D | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Width | IGP | |
| Bus support | n / a | |
| Form factor | MXM-B | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 68.26 GB/s | 72 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2133 MHz (4.3 Gbps effective) | 4000 MHz |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX with others
IntelIris Xe Graphics MAX vs
NVIDIAGeForce 205 OEM
IntelIris Xe Graphics MAX vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 730A
IntelIris Xe Graphics MAX vs
NVIDIAQuadro M4000
IntelIris Xe Graphics MAX vs
NVIDIAQuadro P1000
IntelIris Xe Graphics MAX vs
AMDRadeon RX 560
IntelIris Xe Graphics MAX vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
