Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX vs AMD FirePro M6000
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX and AMD FirePro M6000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- 2475x more texture fill rate: 79.20 GTexel/s vs 32 GTexel / s
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 768 vs 640
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 72% lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 43 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 69% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 13654 vs 8095
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6889 vs 3024
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6889 vs 3024
- Around 89% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3462 vs 1832
- Around 89% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3462 vs 1832
- Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1972 vs 1820
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 31 Oct 2020 vs 1 July 2012 |
Texture fill rate | 79.20 GTexel/s vs 32 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 768 vs 640 |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 43 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 13654 vs 8095 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6889 vs 3024 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6889 vs 3024 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3462 vs 1832 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3462 vs 1832 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1972 vs 1820 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro M6000
- 2.7x more core clock speed: 800 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 88% higher memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 2133 MHz (4.3 Gbps effective)
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 3214
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 3214
- 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 776 vs 311
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 800 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 2133 MHz (4.3 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3214 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3214 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 776 vs 311 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX
GPU 2: AMD FirePro M6000
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX | AMD FirePro M6000 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 13654 | 8095 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6889 | 3024 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6889 | 3024 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3462 | 1832 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3462 | 1832 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3214 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3214 | 3357 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 311 | 776 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1972 | 1820 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX | AMD FirePro M6000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.1 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | DG1 | Heathrow |
Launch date | 31 Oct 2020 | 1 July 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 527 | 528 |
Type | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1650 MHz | |
Compute units | 96 | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 800 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 633.6 GFLOPS (1:4) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 5.069 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 2.534 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 768 | 640 |
Pixel fill rate | 39.60 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 79.20 GTexel/s | 32 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 43 Watt |
Floating-point performance | 1,024 gflops | |
Transistor count | 1,500 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
StereoOutput3D | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Width | IGP | |
Bus support | n / a | |
Form factor | MXM-B | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 68.26 GB/s | 72 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2133 MHz (4.3 Gbps effective) | 4000 MHz |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 |