Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
- Around 38% higher boost clock speed: 1650 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 60% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3462 vs 2168
- Around 60% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3462 vs 2168
- Around 62% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3214 vs 1982
- Around 62% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3214 vs 1982
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 31 Oct 2020 vs 16 Mar 2020 |
Boost clock speed | 1650 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm vs 12 nm |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3462 vs 2168 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3462 vs 2168 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3214 vs 1982 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3214 vs 1982 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
- 3.5x more core clock speed: 1035 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 1024 vs 768
- 5.6x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 2133 MHz (4.3 Gbps effective)
- 2.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 39228 vs 14238
- Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9780 vs 6889
- Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9780 vs 6889
- Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 336 vs 311
- 3.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6514 vs 1972
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1035 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 1024 vs 768 |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz vs 2133 MHz (4.3 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 39228 vs 14238 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9780 vs 6889 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9780 vs 6889 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 336 vs 311 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6514 vs 1972 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 14238 | 39228 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6889 | 9780 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6889 | 9780 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3462 | 2168 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3462 | 2168 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3214 | 1982 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3214 | 1982 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 311 | 336 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1972 | 6514 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3172 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.1 | Turing |
Code name | DG1 | N18P-G62 |
Launch date | 31 Oct 2020 | 16 Mar 2020 |
Place in performance rating | 523 | 425 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1650 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Compute units | 96 | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1035 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 633.6 GFLOPS (1:4) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 5.069 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 2.534 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 768 | 1024 |
Pixel fill rate | 39.60 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 79.20 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | |
Width | IGP | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 68.26 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2133 MHz (4.3 Gbps effective) | 12000 MHz |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | GDDR6 |