Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 11 month(s) later
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 12 nm
  • 4x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 100 Watt
Launch date 31 Oct 2020 vs 22 Nov 2019
Manufacturing process technology 10 nm vs 12 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 25 Watt vs 100 Watt

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

  • 5.1x more core clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 300 MHz
  • Around 5% higher boost clock speed: 1725 MHz vs 1650 MHz
  • Around 74% higher texture fill rate: 138.0 GTexel/s vs 79.20 GTexel/s
  • Around 67% higher pipelines: 1280 vs 768
  • 3.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 55838 vs 14238
  • Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13569 vs 6889
  • Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13569 vs 6889
  • Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 3462
  • Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 3462
  • Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 3214
  • Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 3214
  • 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 751 vs 311
  • 5.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10180 vs 1972
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1530 MHz vs 300 MHz
Boost clock speed 1725 MHz vs 1650 MHz
Texture fill rate 138.0 GTexel/s vs 79.20 GTexel/s
Pipelines 1280 vs 768
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 55838 vs 14238
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 13569 vs 6889
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 13569 vs 6889
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3715 vs 3462
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3715 vs 3462
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3357 vs 3214
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3357 vs 3214
PassMark - G2D Mark 751 vs 311
PassMark - G3D Mark 10180 vs 1972

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
14238
55838
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
6889
13569
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
6889
13569
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3462
3715
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3462
3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3214
3357
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3214
3357
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
311
751
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1972
10180
Name Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
Geekbench - OpenCL 14238 55838
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 6889 13569
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 6889 13569
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3462 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3462 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3214 3357
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3214 3357
PassMark - G2D Mark 311 751
PassMark - G3D Mark 1972 10180
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 178.014
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1961.932
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 11.169
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 109.29
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 787.025
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 352

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

Essentials

Architecture Generation 12.1 Turing
Code name DG1 TU116
Launch date 31 Oct 2020 22 Nov 2019
Place in performance rating 523 283
Type Laptop Desktop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1650 MHz 1725 MHz
Compute units 96
Core clock speed 300 MHz 1530 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 10 nm 12 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 633.6 GFLOPS (1:4) 138.0 GFLOPS (1:32)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 5.069 TFLOPS (2:1) 8.832 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 2.534 TFLOPS 4.416 TFLOPS
Pipelines 768 1280
Pixel fill rate 39.60 GPixel/s 55.20 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 79.20 GTexel/s 138.0 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 25 Watt 100 Watt
Transistor count 6600 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 1xDVI, 1xHDMI, 1xDisplayPort
DisplayPort support
HDMI

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 4.0 x4 PCIe 3.0 x16
Width IGP Dual-slot
Length 9 inches (229 mm)
Recommended system power (PSU) 350 Watt
Supplementary power connectors 1x 6-pin

API support

DirectX 12.1 12.1
OpenCL 2.1 1.2
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Shader Model 6.4 6.4
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 4 GB
Memory bandwidth 68.26 GB/s 192 GB/s
Memory bus width 128 bit 128 bit
Memory clock speed 2133 MHz (4.3 Gbps effective)
Memory type LPDDR4X GDDR6