Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 12 nm
- 4x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 100 Watt
Launch date | 31 Oct 2020 vs 22 Nov 2019 |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm vs 12 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 100 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
- 5.1x more core clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 5% higher boost clock speed: 1725 MHz vs 1650 MHz
- Around 74% higher texture fill rate: 138.0 GTexel/s vs 79.20 GTexel/s
- Around 67% higher pipelines: 1280 vs 768
- 3.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 55838 vs 14238
- Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13569 vs 6889
- Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13569 vs 6889
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 3462
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 3462
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 3214
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 3214
- 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 751 vs 311
- 5.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10180 vs 1972
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1530 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1725 MHz vs 1650 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 138.0 GTexel/s vs 79.20 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 1280 vs 768 |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 55838 vs 14238 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13569 vs 6889 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13569 vs 6889 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 3462 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 3462 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3214 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3214 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 751 vs 311 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10180 vs 1972 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 14238 | 55838 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6889 | 13569 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6889 | 13569 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3462 | 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3462 | 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3214 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3214 | 3357 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 311 | 751 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1972 | 10180 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 178.014 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1961.932 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.169 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 109.29 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 787.025 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 352 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.1 | Turing |
Code name | DG1 | TU116 |
Launch date | 31 Oct 2020 | 22 Nov 2019 |
Place in performance rating | 523 | 283 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1650 MHz | 1725 MHz |
Compute units | 96 | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1530 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 633.6 GFLOPS (1:4) | 138.0 GFLOPS (1:32) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 5.069 TFLOPS (2:1) | 8.832 TFLOPS (2:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 2.534 TFLOPS | 4.416 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 768 | 1280 |
Pixel fill rate | 39.60 GPixel/s | 55.20 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 79.20 GTexel/s | 138.0 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 100 Watt |
Transistor count | 6600 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1xDVI, 1xHDMI, 1xDisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Width | IGP | Dual-slot |
Length | 9 inches (229 mm) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.2 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 68.26 GB/s | 192 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2133 MHz (4.3 Gbps effective) | |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | GDDR6 |