Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX and NVIDIA Quadro 2000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX

NVIDIA Quadro 2000

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX

Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 10 month(s) later
3960x more texture fill rate: 79.20 GTexel/s vs 20 GTexel / s
4x more pipelines: 768 vs 192
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 40 nm
2.5x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 62 Watt
4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
3.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 14238 vs 3879
4.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6889 vs 1600
4.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6889 vs 1600
2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3462 vs 1682
2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3462 vs 1682
Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3214 vs 2668
Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3214 vs 2668
Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 311 vs 303
2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1972 vs 947

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	31 Oct 2020 vs 24 December 2010
Texture fill rate	79.20 GTexel/s vs 20 GTexel / s
Pipelines	768 vs 192
Manufacturing process technology	10 nm vs 40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	25 Watt vs 62 Watt
Maximum memory size	4 GB vs 1 GB
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	14238 vs 3879
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	6889 vs 1600
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	6889 vs 1600
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3462 vs 1682
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3462 vs 1682
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3214 vs 2668
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3214 vs 2668
PassMark - G2D Mark	311 vs 303
PassMark - G3D Mark	1972 vs 947

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 2000

2.1x more core clock speed: 625 MHz vs 300 MHz
Around 22% higher memory clock speed: 2600 MHz vs 2133 MHz (4.3 Gbps effective)

Core clock speed	625 MHz vs 300 MHz
Memory clock speed	2600 MHz vs 2133 MHz (4.3 Gbps effective)

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 2000

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

14238

3879

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

6889

1600

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

6889

1600

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3462

1682

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3462

1682

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3214

2668

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3214

2668

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

311

303

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1972

947

Name	Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX	NVIDIA Quadro 2000
Geekbench - OpenCL	14238	3879
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	6889	1600
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	6889	1600
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3462	1682
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3462	1682
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3214	2668
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3214	2668
PassMark - G2D Mark	311	303
PassMark - G3D Mark	1972	947
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		10.229
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		258.26
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		0.885
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		13.688
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		19.02

Compare specifications (specs)

	Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX	NVIDIA Quadro 2000
Essentials
Architecture	Generation 12.1	Fermi
Code name	DG1	GF106
Launch date	31 Oct 2020	24 December 2010
Place in performance rating	523	1287
Type	Laptop	Workstation
Launch price (MSRP)		$599
Price now		$87.99
Value for money (0-100)		17.65
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1650 MHz
Compute units	96
Core clock speed	300 MHz	625 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	10 nm	40 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	633.6 GFLOPS (1:4)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	5.069 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	2.534 TFLOPS
Pipelines	768	192
Pixel fill rate	39.60 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	79.20 GTexel/s	20 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	25 Watt	62 Watt
Floating-point performance		480.0 gflops
Transistor count		1,170 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x4	PCIe 2.0 x16
Width	IGP
Length		178 mm
Supplementary power connectors		None
API support
DirectX	12.1	12.0 (11_0)
OpenCL	2.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.4
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	1 GB
Memory bandwidth	68.26 GB/s	41.6 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	2133 MHz (4.3 Gbps effective)	2600 MHz
Memory type	LPDDR4X	GDDR5