Intel UHD Graphics 600 vs NVIDIA GeForce 510 OEM
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 600 and NVIDIA GeForce 510 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 600
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 5x lower typical power consumption: 5 Watt vs 25 Watt
- Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 318 vs 290
- Around 32% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 1004 vs 758
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 11 December 2017 vs 29 September 2011 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 5 Watt vs 25 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 318 vs 290 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1004 vs 758 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 510 OEM
- 2.6x more core clock speed: 523 MHz vs 200 MHz
- 4x more pipelines: 48 vs 12
- Around 77% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 163 vs 92
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1254 vs 1000
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1723 vs 1701
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1254 vs 1000
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1723 vs 1701
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 523 MHz vs 200 MHz |
| Pipelines | 48 vs 12 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 163 vs 92 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1254 vs 1000 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1723 vs 1701 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1254 vs 1000 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1723 vs 1701 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 600
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 510 OEM
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel UHD Graphics 600 | NVIDIA GeForce 510 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 318 | 290 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 92 | 163 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1004 | 758 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.952 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 56.77 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.427 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 5.876 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 6.882 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 476 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1000 | 1254 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1701 | 1723 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 476 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1000 | 1254 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1701 | 1723 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel UHD Graphics 600 | NVIDIA GeForce 510 OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Fermi 2.0 |
| Code name | Gemini Lake GT1 | GF119 |
| Launch date | 11 December 2017 | 29 September 2011 |
| Place in performance rating | 1624 | 1360 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 750 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 200 MHz | 523 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 12 | 48 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 5 Watt | 25 Watt |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 292 million |
| Floating-point performance | 100.42 gflops | |
| Texture fill rate | 4.18 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 145 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory type | DDR4 / LPDDR4 | DDR3 |
| Shared memory | 1 | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.37 GB / s | |
| Memory clock speed | 1796 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel UHD Graphics 600 with others
IntelUHD Graphics 600 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7500 LE
IntelUHD Graphics 600 vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 1500
IntelUHD Graphics 600 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 8600 GT
IntelUHD Graphics 600 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6450
IntelUHD Graphics 600 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 610
IntelUHD Graphics 600 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8250
