Intel UHD Graphics 600 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 600 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 600
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 28x lower typical power consumption: 5 Watt vs 140 Watt
| Launch date | 11 December 2017 vs 6 September 2012 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 5 Watt vs 140 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
- 4.9x more core clock speed: 980 MHz vs 200 MHz
- Around 38% higher boost clock speed: 1033 MHz vs 750 MHz
- 80x more pipelines: 960 vs 12
- 12.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4017 vs 318
- 5.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 487 vs 92
- 11.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11364 vs 1004
- 5.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 30.505 vs 5.952
- 12.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 705.293 vs 56.77
- 7.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.085 vs 0.427
- 6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 35.416 vs 5.876
- 9.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 62.69 vs 6.882
- 7.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3581 vs 476
- 3.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3690 vs 1000
- Around 98% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3365 vs 1701
- 7.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3581 vs 476
- 3.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3690 vs 1000
- Around 98% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3365 vs 1701
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 980 MHz vs 200 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1033 MHz vs 750 MHz |
| Pipelines | 960 vs 12 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4017 vs 318 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 487 vs 92 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11364 vs 1004 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 30.505 vs 5.952 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 705.293 vs 56.77 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.085 vs 0.427 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.416 vs 5.876 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 62.69 vs 6.882 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3581 vs 476 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3690 vs 1000 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3365 vs 1701 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3581 vs 476 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3690 vs 1000 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3365 vs 1701 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 600
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel UHD Graphics 600 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 318 | 4017 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 92 | 487 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1004 | 11364 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.952 | 30.505 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 56.77 | 705.293 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.427 | 3.085 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 5.876 | 35.416 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 6.882 | 62.69 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 476 | 3581 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1000 | 3690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1701 | 3365 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 476 | 3581 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1000 | 3690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1701 | 3365 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 1307 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel UHD Graphics 600 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Kepler |
| Code name | Gemini Lake GT1 | GK106 |
| Launch date | 11 December 2017 | 6 September 2012 |
| Place in performance rating | 1624 | 740 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $229 | |
| Price now | $349.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 14.35 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 750 MHz | 1033 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 200 MHz | 980 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 12 | 960 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 5 Watt | 140 Watt |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 2,540 million |
| CUDA cores | 960 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,981 gflops | |
| Texture fill rate | 78.4 billion / sec | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI..., 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Length | 9.5" (24.1 cm) | |
| Supplementary power connectors | One 6-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.3 |
Memory |
||
| Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 192-bit GDDR5 |
| Memory type | DDR4 / LPDDR4 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 1 | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 144.2 GB / s | |
| Memory clock speed | 6.0 GB/s | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel UHD Graphics 600 with others
IntelUHD Graphics 600 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7500 LE
IntelUHD Graphics 600 vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 1500
IntelUHD Graphics 600 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 8600 GT
IntelUHD Graphics 600 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6450
IntelUHD Graphics 600 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 610
IntelUHD Graphics 600 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8250
