Intel UHD Graphics 600 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel UHD Graphics 600 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics 600
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 5 ans 3 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 28x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 5 Watt versus 140 Watt
| Date de sortie | 11 December 2017 versus 6 September 2012 |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 5 Watt versus 140 Watt |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
- 4.9x plus de vitesse du noyau: 980 MHz versus 200 MHz
- Environ 38% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1033 MHz versus 750 MHz
- 80x plus de pipelines: 960 versus 12
- 12.6x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 4017 versus 318
- 5.3x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 487 versus 92
- 11.3x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 11364 versus 1004
- 5.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 30.505 versus 5.952
- 12.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 705.293 versus 56.77
- 7.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.085 versus 0.427
- 6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 35.416 versus 5.876
- 9.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 62.69 versus 6.882
- 7.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3581 versus 476
- 3.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3690 versus 1000
- Environ 98% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3365 versus 1701
- 7.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3581 versus 476
- 3.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3690 versus 1000
- Environ 98% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3365 versus 1701
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 980 MHz versus 200 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1033 MHz versus 750 MHz |
| Pipelines | 960 versus 12 |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4017 versus 318 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 487 versus 92 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11364 versus 1004 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 30.505 versus 5.952 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 705.293 versus 56.77 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.085 versus 0.427 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.416 versus 5.876 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 62.69 versus 6.882 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3581 versus 476 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3690 versus 1000 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3365 versus 1701 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3581 versus 476 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3690 versus 1000 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3365 versus 1701 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 600
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel UHD Graphics 600 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 318 | 4017 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 92 | 487 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1004 | 11364 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.952 | 30.505 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 56.77 | 705.293 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.427 | 3.085 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 5.876 | 35.416 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 6.882 | 62.69 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 476 | 3581 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1000 | 3690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1701 | 3365 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 476 | 3581 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1000 | 3690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1701 | 3365 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 1307 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel UHD Graphics 600 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Kepler |
| Nom de code | Gemini Lake GT1 | GK106 |
| Date de sortie | 11 December 2017 | 6 September 2012 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1624 | 740 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $229 | |
| Prix maintenant | $349.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 14.35 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 750 MHz | 1033 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 200 MHz | 980 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 12 | 960 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 5 Watt | 140 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 189 million | 2,540 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 960 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,981 gflops | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 78.4 billion / sec | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI..., 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Longeur | 9.5" (24.1 cm) | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | One 6-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.3 |
Mémoire |
||
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 192-bit GDDR5 |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR4 / LPDDR4 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 1 | |
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 144.2 GB / s | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 6.0 GB/s | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Intel UHD Graphics 600 avec des autres
IntelUHD Graphics 600 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7500 LE
IntelUHD Graphics 600 vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 1500
IntelUHD Graphics 600 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 8600 GT
IntelUHD Graphics 600 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6450
IntelUHD Graphics 600 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 610
IntelUHD Graphics 600 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8250
