Intel UHD Graphics 615 vs ATI Radeon HD 3870
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 615 and ATI Radeon HD 3870 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 615
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- 2027.4x more texture fill rate: 25.2 GTexel/s vs 12.43 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 55 nm
- 21.2x lower typical power consumption: 5 Watt vs 106 Watt
- 32x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 512 MB
- Around 33% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 740 vs 555
- 3.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 185 vs 58
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 7 November 2018 vs 19 November 2007 |
| Texture fill rate | 25.2 GTexel/s vs 12.43 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 55 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 5 Watt vs 106 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 512 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 740 vs 555 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 185 vs 58 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 3870
- 2.6x more core clock speed: 777 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 13.3x more pipelines: 320 vs 24
- Around 23% better floating-point performance: 497.3 gflops vs 403.2 gflops
- Around 77% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3131 vs 1772
- Around 77% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3131 vs 1772
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 777 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 320 vs 24 |
| Floating-point performance | 497.3 gflops vs 403.2 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3131 vs 1772 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3131 vs 1772 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 615
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 3870
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel UHD Graphics 615 | ATI Radeon HD 3870 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 740 | 555 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 185 | 58 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3242 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.583 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 221.42 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.34 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.269 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 23.383 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1256 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1720 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1772 | 3131 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1256 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1720 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1772 | 3131 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel UHD Graphics 615 | ATI Radeon HD 3870 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | TeraScale |
| Code name | Kaby Lake GT2 | RV670 |
| Launch date | 7 November 2018 | 19 November 2007 |
| Place in performance rating | 1390 | 1389 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $269 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 777 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 403.2 gflops | 497.3 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 55 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 100.8 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 806.4 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 403.2 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 24 | 320 |
| Pixel fill rate | 3.150 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 25.2 GTexel/s | 12.43 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 5 Watt | 106 Watt |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 666 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 241 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 10.0 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 | GDDR4 |
| Shared memory | Yes | |
| Memory bandwidth | 72.1 GB / s | |
| Memory clock speed | 2252 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel UHD Graphics 615 with others
IntelUHD Graphics 615 vs
ATIRadeon HD 3870
IntelUHD Graphics 615 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 9600 GSO
IntelUHD Graphics 615 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 260
IntelUHD Graphics 615 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M340
IntelUHD Graphics 615 vs
AMDRadeon R5 M320
IntelUHD Graphics 615 vs
IntelHD Graphics 520
