Intel UHD Graphics 615 vs Intel HD Graphics 520

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 615 and Intel HD Graphics 520 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 615

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 2 month(s) later
• 3x lower typical power consumption: 5 Watt vs 15 Watt
• Around 55% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 221.42 vs 143.083
• Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.34 vs 1.243
• Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1256 vs 951
• Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1720 vs 1462
• Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1256 vs 951
• Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1720 vs 1462

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 520

• 2x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 16 GB
• Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 868 vs 740
• Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 211 vs 185
• Around 24% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4014 vs 3242
• Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 21.852 vs 18.583
• Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 12.958 vs 12.269
• Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 28.182 vs 23.383
• Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3337 vs 1772
• Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3337 vs 1772

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 615
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 520

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	740 868
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	185 211
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	3242 4014
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	18.583 21.852
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	221.42 143.083
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.34 1.243
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12.269 12.958
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	23.383 28.182
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1256 951
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1720 1462
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1772 3337
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1256 951
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1720 1462
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1772 3337

Compare specifications (specs)