Intel UHD Graphics 615 vs AMD Radeon R5 M320
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 615 and AMD Radeon R5 M320 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 615
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 23% higher boost clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 855 MHz
- 1473.7x more texture fill rate: 25.2 GTexel/s vs 17.1 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 67% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 740 vs 444
- Around 33% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 185 vs 139
- Around 48% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 18.583 vs 12.564
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1256 vs 1202
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1256 vs 1202
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 7 November 2018 vs 5 May 2015 |
| Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz vs 855 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 25.2 GTexel/s vs 17.1 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 4 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 740 vs 444 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 185 vs 139 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.583 vs 12.564 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1256 vs 1202 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1256 vs 1202 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 M320
- 2.6x more core clock speed: 780 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 13.3x more pipelines: 320 vs 24
- Around 36% better floating-point performance: 547.2 gflops vs 403.2 gflops
- Around 54% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5006 vs 3242
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 780 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 320 vs 24 |
| Floating-point performance | 547.2 gflops vs 403.2 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5006 vs 3242 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 615
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 M320
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel UHD Graphics 615 | AMD Radeon R5 M320 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 740 | 444 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 185 | 139 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3242 | 5006 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.583 | 12.564 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 221.42 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.34 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.269 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 23.383 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1256 | 1202 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1720 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1772 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1256 | 1202 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1720 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1772 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel UHD Graphics 615 | AMD Radeon R5 M320 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Kaby Lake GT2 | Jet |
| Launch date | 7 November 2018 | 5 May 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 1390 | 1392 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Design | AMD Radeon R5 300 Series | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | 855 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 780 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 403.2 gflops | 547.2 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 100.8 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 806.4 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 403.2 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 24 | 320 |
| Pixel fill rate | 3.150 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 25.2 GTexel/s | 17.1 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 5 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 1,040 million |
| Compute units | 5 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | Not Listed |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
| Mantle | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 bit |
| Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 | DDR3 |
| Shared memory | Yes | 0 |
| Memory bandwidth | 16 GB / s | |
| Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| HD3D | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Switchable graphics | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel UHD Graphics 615 with others
IntelUHD Graphics 615 vs
ATIRadeon HD 3870
IntelUHD Graphics 615 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 9600 GSO
IntelUHD Graphics 615 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 260
IntelUHD Graphics 615 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M340
IntelUHD Graphics 615 vs
AMDRadeon R5 M320
IntelUHD Graphics 615 vs
IntelHD Graphics 520
