Intel UHD Graphics 615 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 615 and NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 615
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- 954.5x more texture fill rate: 25.2 GTexel/s vs 26.4 billion / sec
- Around 53% better floating-point performance: 403.2 gflops vs 264 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 65 nm
- 21x lower typical power consumption: 5 Watt vs 105 Watt
- 42.7x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 384 MB
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 740 vs 327
- Around 81% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 185 vs 102
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 7 November 2018 vs 28 April 2008 |
| Texture fill rate | 25.2 GTexel/s vs 26.4 billion / sec |
| Floating-point performance | 403.2 gflops vs 264 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 65 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 5 Watt vs 105 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 384 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 740 vs 327 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 185 vs 102 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO
- 4.6x more core clock speed: 1375 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 4x more pipelines: 96 vs 24
- Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2160 vs 1772
- Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2160 vs 1772
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1375 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 96 vs 24 |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2160 vs 1772 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2160 vs 1772 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 615
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel UHD Graphics 615 | NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 740 | 327 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 185 | 102 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3242 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.583 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 221.42 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.34 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.269 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 23.383 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1256 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1720 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1772 | 2160 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1256 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1720 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1772 | 2160 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel UHD Graphics 615 | NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Tesla |
| Code name | Kaby Lake GT2 | G92 |
| Launch date | 7 November 2018 | 28 April 2008 |
| Place in performance rating | 1390 | 1388 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $49.99 | |
| Price now | $49.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 13.43 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1375 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 403.2 gflops | 264 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 65 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 100.8 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 806.4 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 403.2 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 24 | 96 |
| Pixel fill rate | 3.150 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 25.2 GTexel/s | 26.4 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 5 Watt | 105 Watt |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 754 million |
| CUDA cores | 96 | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video, Dual Link DVIHDTV |
| Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Length | 9" (22.9 cm) | |
| SLI options | 2-way | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 10.0 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.1 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 384 MB |
| Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 | GDDR3 |
| Shared memory | Yes | |
| Memory bandwidth | 38.4 GB / s | |
| Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
| CUDA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel UHD Graphics 615 with others
IntelUHD Graphics 615 vs
ATIRadeon HD 3870
IntelUHD Graphics 615 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 9600 GSO
IntelUHD Graphics 615 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 260
IntelUHD Graphics 615 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M340
IntelUHD Graphics 615 vs
AMDRadeon R5 M320
IntelUHD Graphics 615 vs
IntelHD Graphics 520
