Intel UHD Graphics 620 vs AMD Radeon R4 Graphics

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 620 and AMD Radeon R4 Graphics videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

Intel UHD Graphics 620

AMD Radeon R4 Graphics

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 620

Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 2 month(s) later
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1042 vs 342
2.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 241 vs 99
5.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 27.062 vs 4.721
2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 273.504 vs 107.613
4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.777 vs 0.445
Around 88% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 19.939 vs 10.612
2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 31.881 vs 13.097
Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1397 vs 701
Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2227 vs 1811
Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1397 vs 701
Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2227 vs 1811

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	1 September 2017 vs 11 June 2014
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 28 nm
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	1042 vs 342
PassMark - G2D Mark	241 vs 99
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	27.062 vs 4.721
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	273.504 vs 107.613
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.777 vs 0.445
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	19.939 vs 10.612
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	31.881 vs 13.097
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1397 vs 701
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2227 vs 1811
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1397 vs 701
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2227 vs 1811

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R4 Graphics

2.7x more core clock speed: 800 MHz vs 300 MHz
5.3x more pipelines: 128 vs 24
Around 83% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8386 vs 4592
Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1338 vs 878
Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1338 vs 878

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	800 MHz vs 300 MHz
Pipelines	128 vs 24
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	8386 vs 4592
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1338 vs 878
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1338 vs 878

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 620
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R4 Graphics

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1042

342

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

241

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

4592

8386

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

27.062

4.721

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

273.504

107.613

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1.777

0.445

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

19.939

10.612

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

31.881

13.097

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1397

701

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

878

1338

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2227

1811

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1397

701

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

878

1338

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2227

1811

Name	Intel UHD Graphics 620	AMD Radeon R4 Graphics
PassMark - G3D Mark	1042	342
PassMark - G2D Mark	241	99
Geekbench - OpenCL	4592	8386
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	27.062	4.721
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	273.504	107.613
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.777	0.445
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	19.939	10.612
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	31.881	13.097
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1397	701
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	878	1338
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2227	1811
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1397	701
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	878	1338
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2227	1811
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	62

Compare specifications (specs)

	Intel UHD Graphics 620	AMD Radeon R4 Graphics
Essentials
Architecture	Generation 9.5	GCN 2.0
Code name	Kaby Lake GT2	Beema
Launch date	1 September 2017	11 June 2014
Place in performance rating	1380	1540
Type	Laptop	Desktop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1150 MHz
Core clock speed	300 MHz	800 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	24	128
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt	15 Watt
Transistor count	189 million	930 million
Floating-point performance		204.8 gflops
Texture fill rate		6.4 GTexel / s
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x1	IGP
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_1)	12.0 (12_0)
OpenGL	4.5	4.5
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	32 GB
Memory bus width	64 / 128 Bit
Memory type	LPDDR3 / DDR4	System Shared
Shared memory	1
Technologies
Quick Sync