Intel UHD Graphics 620 versus AMD Radeon R4 Graphics
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel UHD Graphics 620 and AMD Radeon R4 Graphics pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics 620
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 2 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 3x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1042 versus 342
- 2.4x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 241 versus 99
- 5.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 27.062 versus 4.721
- 2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 273.504 versus 107.613
- 4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.777 versus 0.445
- Environ 88% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 19.939 versus 10.612
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 31.881 versus 13.097
- Environ 99% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1397 versus 701
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2227 versus 1811
- Environ 99% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1397 versus 701
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2227 versus 1811
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 1 September 2017 versus 11 June 2014 |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1042 versus 342 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 241 versus 99 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.062 versus 4.721 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 273.504 versus 107.613 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.777 versus 0.445 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.939 versus 10.612 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 31.881 versus 13.097 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1397 versus 701 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2227 versus 1811 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1397 versus 701 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2227 versus 1811 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R4 Graphics
- 2.7x plus de vitesse du noyau: 800 MHz versus 300 MHz
- 5.3x plus de pipelines: 128 versus 24
- Environ 83% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 8386 versus 4592
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1338 versus 878
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1338 versus 878
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 800 MHz versus 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 128 versus 24 |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 8386 versus 4592 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1338 versus 878 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1338 versus 878 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 620
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R4 Graphics
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel UHD Graphics 620 | AMD Radeon R4 Graphics |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1042 | 342 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 241 | 99 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4592 | 8386 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.062 | 4.721 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 273.504 | 107.613 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.777 | 0.445 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.939 | 10.612 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 31.881 | 13.097 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1397 | 701 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 878 | 1338 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2227 | 1811 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1397 | 701 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 878 | 1338 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2227 | 1811 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 62 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel UHD Graphics 620 | AMD Radeon R4 Graphics | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | GCN 2.0 |
| Nom de code | Kaby Lake GT2 | Beema |
| Date de sortie | 1 September 2017 | 11 June 2014 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1380 | 1540 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1150 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 24 | 128 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 189 million | 930 million |
| Performance á point flottant | 204.8 gflops | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 6.4 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | IGP |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 32 GB | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | |
| Genre de mémoire | LPDDR3 / DDR4 | System Shared |
| Mémoire partagé | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Intel UHD Graphics 620 avec des autres
IntelUHD Graphics 620 vs
ATIMobility Radeon 7500
IntelUHD Graphics 620 vs
ATIAll-In-Wonder 9000 PRO
IntelUHD Graphics 620 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M340
IntelUHD Graphics 620 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 910M
IntelUHD Graphics 620 vs
IntelHD Graphics 520
IntelUHD Graphics 620 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8370D IGP
