Intel UHD Graphics 620 vs AMD Radeon R5 M330

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 620 and AMD Radeon R5 M330 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 620

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
  • Around 12% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 1030 MHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • Around 20% lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 18 Watt
  • 8x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 4 GB
  • Around 75% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1042 vs 596
  • Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1397 vs 1155
  • Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1397 vs 1155
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 1 September 2017 vs 5 May 2015
Boost clock speed 1150 MHz vs 1030 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt vs 18 Watt
Maximum memory size 32 GB vs 4 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 1042 vs 596
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1397 vs 1155
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1397 vs 1155

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 M330

  • 3.2x more core clock speed: 955 MHz vs 300 MHz
  • 13.3x more pipelines: 320 vs 24
  • 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 519 vs 241
  • Around 28% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5874 vs 4592
  • 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 69.096 vs 31.881
  • 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1850 vs 878
  • Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2691 vs 2227
  • 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1850 vs 878
  • Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2691 vs 2227
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 955 MHz vs 300 MHz
Pipelines 320 vs 24
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 519 vs 241
Geekbench - OpenCL 5874 vs 4592
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 69.096 vs 31.881
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1850 vs 878
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2691 vs 2227
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1850 vs 878
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2691 vs 2227

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 620
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 M330

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1042
596
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
241
519
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
4592
5874
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
31.881
69.096
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1397
1155
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
878
1850
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2227
2691
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1397
1155
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
878
1850
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2227
2691
Name Intel UHD Graphics 620 AMD Radeon R5 M330
PassMark - G3D Mark 1042 596
PassMark - G2D Mark 241 519
Geekbench - OpenCL 4592 5874
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 27.062
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 273.504
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.777
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 19.939
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 31.881 69.096
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1397 1155
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 878 1850
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2227 2691
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1397 1155
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 878 1850
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2227 2691
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 62

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel UHD Graphics 620 AMD Radeon R5 M330

Essentials

Architecture Generation 9.5 GCN 1.0
Code name Kaby Lake GT2 Exo
Launch date 1 September 2017 5 May 2015
Place in performance rating 1380 926
Type Laptop Desktop
Design AMD Radeon R5 300 Series

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1150 MHz 1030 MHz
Core clock speed 300 MHz 955 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 24 320
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt 18 Watt
Transistor count 189 million 1,040 million
Compute units 5
Floating-point performance 659.2 gflops
Texture fill rate 20.6 GTexel / s

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x1 PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus support PCIe 3.0
Supplementary power connectors None

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_1) 12
OpenGL 4.5 4.4
Mantle
OpenCL Not Listed
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 4 GB
Memory bus width 64 / 128 Bit 64 bit
Memory type LPDDR3 / DDR4 DDR3
Shared memory 1 0
Memory bandwidth 14.4 GB / s
Memory clock speed 1000 MHz

Technologies

Quick Sync
DualGraphics
HD3D
PowerTune
Switchable graphics
ZeroCore