Intel UHD Graphics 620 vs AMD Radeon R5 M330
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 620 and AMD Radeon R5 M330 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 620
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 12% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 1030 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 20% lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 18 Watt
- 8x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 75% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1042 vs 596
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1397 vs 1155
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1397 vs 1155
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 September 2017 vs 5 May 2015 |
Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz vs 1030 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 18 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1042 vs 596 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1397 vs 1155 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1397 vs 1155 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 M330
- 3.2x more core clock speed: 955 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 13.3x more pipelines: 320 vs 24
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 519 vs 241
- Around 28% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5874 vs 4592
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 69.096 vs 31.881
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1850 vs 878
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2691 vs 2227
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1850 vs 878
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2691 vs 2227
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 955 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 320 vs 24 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 519 vs 241 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5874 vs 4592 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 69.096 vs 31.881 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1850 vs 878 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2691 vs 2227 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1850 vs 878 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2691 vs 2227 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 620
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 M330
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel UHD Graphics 620 | AMD Radeon R5 M330 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1042 | 596 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 241 | 519 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4592 | 5874 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.062 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 273.504 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.777 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.939 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 31.881 | 69.096 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1397 | 1155 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 878 | 1850 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2227 | 2691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1397 | 1155 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 878 | 1850 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2227 | 2691 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 62 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel UHD Graphics 620 | AMD Radeon R5 M330 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT2 | Exo |
Launch date | 1 September 2017 | 5 May 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 1380 | 926 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon R5 300 Series | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | 1030 MHz |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 955 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 24 | 320 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 18 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 1,040 million |
Compute units | 5 | |
Floating-point performance | 659.2 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 20.6 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | Not Listed | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 bit |
Memory type | LPDDR3 / DDR4 | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 1 | 0 |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | |
Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync | ||
DualGraphics | ||
HD3D | ||
PowerTune | ||
Switchable graphics | ||
ZeroCore |